Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Position Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Position Paper
Position Paper
Write a persuasive argument encouraging your Congressman to adopt your position (against, for or for with restrictions) regarding the legalization of human cloning. The persuasive editorial must contain at least 3 fully developed supporting paragraphs . You are to demonstrate your comprehension of the subject as well as your writing skills utilizing appropriate vocabulary.
Rubric Code:
BB88A9
By
laneyk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Excellent
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Incomplete
0 pts
Content & Development
Excellent
-Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive with a strong lead
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Fair
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
-Strong lead sentence
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Poor
- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
-No use of direct quotes
Incomplete
-No content or major points were given.
Organization & Structure
Excellent
- Structure of the article is clear and easy to follow.
-Flow of ideas fluid and logical.
Fair
- Structure of the article is not that easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need some improvement.
Poor
- Organization and structure detract from the content.
- Article is disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Incomplete
-No organization or structure was developed.
Format, Punctuation & Spelling
Excellent
- Article follows designated guidelines.
- Article is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
-Very few or no faults with respect to spelling/accentuation or punctuation.
Fair
- Article follows most guidelines.
-Occasional faults in spelling/accentuation or punctuation.
Poor
- Article lacks many elements of the correct format.
-Frequent errors in spelling/accentuation or punctuation.
- Article is inadequate/excessive in length
Incomplete
-No Article was written.
Grammar & Vocabulary
Excellent
- Rules of grammar and usage are followed.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
-Strong use of descriptive vocabulary
Fair
- Article contains few grammatical errors.
- Vocabulary somewhat limited.
Poor
- Article contains numerous grammatical errors.
Incomplete
-No Article was written.
Keywords:
Persuasive Argument, Position Paper, Genetics, Human Cloning, Genetic Engineering
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.