Skip to main content
iRubric: World Music Games rubric

iRubric: World Music Games rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
World Music Games 
World Music Games
Students will use information learned in their World Music Listening Unit of study to prepare a review game in small groups.
Rubric Code: AXW3A94
By jlouden
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Game Appearance
  Poor

1 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Bonus

2 pts

Materials

Poor

Materials used on the game board are not in good condition. Words are difficult to read. Spaces are unclear.
Good

Materials are in decent condition. Words are readable. Spaces are clear.
Excellent

Materials are colorful and in excellent condition. Words are written neatly and creatively. Spaces are clear and interesting.
Bonus

Materials are sturdy and creatively put together. Pieces are creative.
Rules

Poor

Rules are not written down. Rules are difficult to impossible to follow and understand. They do not assist game play.
Good

Rules are written down but are confusing to follow. They assist only slightly in following game play.
Excellent

Rules are written down and easy to follow. They assist in following game play.
Bonus

Rules are typed.
Cards

Poor

Less than 50 cards or questions were created. Questions did not cover the material.
Good

50 cards were created but the questions were not interesting or did not cover the material well.
Excellent

50 cards were created. The questions were interesting and covered the material well.
Bonus

More than 50 cards were created. The questions were creative and fun.
Game Play
  Poor

1 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Bonus

2 pts

Work Ethic

Poor

Students were not on task and the game suffered because of poor work ethic.
Good

Students were on task most of the time, but were obviously not meeting their potential.
Excellent

Students were on task consistently and reached their potential for the project.
Bonus

Students spent time outside of class working on the project.
Participation

Poor

Students played the other games, but were severely argumentative or disruptive.
Good

Students played the other games well, but were mildly argumentative or disruptive.
Excellent

Students played the other games well, participated fairly, and remained in good spirits until completion.
Bonus

Students showed enthusiasm and good sportsmanship.
Accuracy in Response

Poor

Students were not able to answer the majority of questions correctly.
Good

Students were able to answer about half of the questions correctly.
Excellent

Students were able to answer most of the questions correctly.
Bonus

Students answered all but one or two of the questions correctly.
Game Leadership
  Poor

1 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Bonus

2 pts

Emcee

Poor

Emcee was not prepared and did not read questions correctly. Emcee did not know how to pronounce vocab words.
Good

Emcee was prepared but unenthusiastic. Emcee read questions correctly about half the time and did not know how to pronounce many of the vocab words.
Excellent

Emcee was enthusiastic. Emcee read questions correctly the majority of the time, and knew how to pronounce most major vocab words.
Bonus

Emcee tried very well to be interesting and fun. Emcee pronounced all major vocab words correctly.
Score Keeper

Poor

Score keeper did not know how to keep score, relied completely on others, and
Good

Score keeper relied on others to help keep score and only kept accurate about half the time.
Excellent

Score keeper did not rely on others for help and kept the score accurately the whole time.
Bonus

Score keeper kept the score neatly and large enough for both teams playing the game to see and follow along.
Referee

Poor

Referee was not involved in game play most of the time and did not know whether answers given by players were right or wrong.
Good

Referee responded to an answer's being right or wrong with accuracy about half the time. They followed the game about half of the time.
Excellent

Referee knew the answers to questions as being either right or wrong and followed the game well.
Bonus

Referee invented a creative way to show right or wrong answers to players.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16