- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Journal Entry on Proofreading rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Journal Entry on Proofreading You have been introduced to a variety of proofreading strategies, and learned that editing and proofreading are two distinct processes. Identify at least 2 proofreading strategies you have successfully used in the past, then discuss how you propose to incorporate 2 new strategies introduced in class in future writing assignments. Entry should be between 350-500 words. Rubric Code: AX644C8 By jharriman78 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Journal Entry on Proofreading
	Exemplary 100 pts	Proficient 90 pts	Needs Improvement 70 pts	Not Evident 0 pts
Identification of Past Strategies	Exemplary Identifies 2 or more proofreading strategies used in the past, and includes specific details on how they were used.	Proficient Identifies 2 proofreading strategies used in the past, and includes details on how they were used.	Needs Improvement Identifies 1 proofreading strategy used in the past, and includes vague details on how they were used.	Not Evident Past strategies are not included.
Identification of New Strategies	Exemplary Identifies 2 new proofreading strategies used in class, and includes specific details on how they are used.	Proficient Identifies 2 new proofreading strategies used in class, and includes some details about how they are used.	Needs Improvement Identifies 1 new proofreading strategy, and includes vague details on use.	Not Evident New strategies are not included.
Personal Reflection on Proofreading	Exemplary Meets “Proficient” criteria and uses specific, relevant examples to support personal experience with proofreading strategies in past writing activities.	Proficient Includes a clear and relevant personal reflection, and makes connections to one's own experiences in relation to proofreading strategies.	Needs Improvement Includes a personal reflection, but connections are not clear or lack details.	Not Evident Does not include a personal reflection.
Articulation of Response	Exemplary Journal entry is free of errors in grammar, organization, and spelling.	Proficient Journal entry is mostly free of errors in grammar, organization, and spelling. Errors are slight, and rarely interrupt the flow.	Needs Improvement Journal entries contain errors in grammar,organization, and spelling, but are limited enough so that entry can be understood.	Not Evident Journal entry contains errors of grammar and organization, making the journal entry difficult to understand.