Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Seminar Cycle 2015 Post Content Only rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Seminar Cycle 2015 Post Content Only
Seminar Cycle 2015
Includes pre-writing, seminar, and post-writing activities
Rubric Code:
QX3CB39
By
knightcsas
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Seminar Cycle Post Content
Advanced
5 pts
4.7 pts
Meets Expectations
4.3 pts
4 pts
Approaches Expectations
3.8 pts
3.4 pts
Not Yet
3 pts
Poor
1 pts
Idea Development
3 pts
Advanced
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• utilizes well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient
evidence from the text to insightfully
develop the topic.
• thoroughly and accurately explains and
elaborates on the evidence provided,
demonstrating a clear understanding of the
topic and the ideas of seminar.
4.7
( x 3 pts)
Meets Expectations
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• utilizes relevant and sufficient evidence from
the text to adequately develop the topic.
• adequately and accurately explains and
elaborates on the evidence provided,
demonstrating a sufficient understanding of
the topic and the ideas of seminar.
4
( x 3 pts)
Approaches Expectations
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• utilizes mostly relevant but insufficient
evidence from the text to partially develop
the topic. Some evidence may be inaccurate
or repetitive.
• explains some of the evidence provided,
demonstrating only a partial understanding of
the topic and the ideas of seminar. There may be some
level of inaccuracy in the explanation.
3.4
( x 3 pts)
Not Yet
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• utilizes mostly irrelevant or no evidence from the text, or mostly/only personal
knowledge, to inadequately develop the topic.
Evidence is inaccurate or repetitive.
• inadequately or inaccurately explains the
evidence provided, demonstrating little
understanding of the topic and the ideas of seminar.
Poor
Missing
Focus & Organization
3 pts
Advanced
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• contains an effective and relevant introduction.
• utilizes effective organizational strategies to create a unified whole and to aid in comprehension.
• effectively clarifies relationships among ideas and concepts to create cohesion.
• contains an effective and relevant concluding
statement or section.
4.7
( x 3 pts)
Meets Expectations
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• contains a relevant introduction.
• utilizes adequate organizational strategies to create a
mostly unified whole and to aid in comprehension.
• clarifies most relationships among ideas and concepts,
but there may be some gaps in cohesion.
• contains a relevant concluding statement or section.
4
( x 3 pts)
Approaches Expectations
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• contains a limited introduction.
• demonstrates an attempt to use organizational
strategies to create some unification, but ideas may
be hard to follow at times.
• clarifies some relationships among ideas and
concepts, but there are lapses in focus.
• contains a limited concluding statement or section.
3.4
( x 3 pts)
Not Yet
In response to the task and the seminar, the writing:
• contains no or an irrelevant introduction.
• demonstrates an unclear organizational structure;
ideas are hard to follow most of the time.
• fails to clarify relationships among ideas and concepts;
concepts are unclear and/or there is a lack of focus.
• contains no or an irrelevant concluding statement or
section.
Poor
Missing
Mechanics and Conventions
2 pts
Advanced
The writing:
• demonstrates consistent and
sophisticated command of grade level
conventions of standard
written English.
• may contain a few minor errors that
do not interfere with meaning.
4.7
( x 2 pts)
Meets Expectations
The writing:
• demonstrates consistent command
of grade-level conventions of
standard written English.
• contains some minor and/or major
errors, but the errors do not
significantly interfere with meaning.
4
( x 2 pts)
Approaches Expectations
The writing:
• demonstrates consistent command
of grade-level conventions of
standard written English.
• contains some minor and/or major
errors, but the errors do not
significantly interfere with meaning.
3.4
( x 2 pts)
Not Yet
The writing:
• demonstrates limited command of grade-level conventions of standard written English.
• contains numerous and repeated errors that seriously impede
meaning.
Poor
Missing
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.