DGreenhut's Website
Category/ Assessment |
Excellent (1.5) |
Above Average (1.0) |
Average (0.5) |
Below Average (0) |
Introduction & Topic |
The topic for investigation was specific and achievable; clearly linked to an important aesthetic question of influence |
Although the topic was specific and achievable, it was only indirectly linked to an important aesthetic question |
Topic was too broad and only marginally linked to an important question |
Topic was either too broad, not clearly stated, poorly managed, or not linked to an important question |
Thesis—regarding one artist’s influence over another |
The thesis statement had an interpretive angle and was clearly stated in the introduction to the paper |
The thesis statement was clearly stated in the introduction |
The thesis statement was more descriptive than interpretive |
The thesis statement was poorly stated or not apparent |
Interpretation |
The interpretation was original and presented a perceptive, organized analysis, including a response to counterarguments |
The interpretation showed some original thought and some response to counterarguments |
The interpretation summarized or restated ideas from sources instead of presenting the writer’s view; more narrative than analytical |
No discernible interpretation or response to counterarguments appears |
Organization |
Information was very well organized with a specific and clearly understood viewpoint that lead to a well-supported conclusion and included APA sections |
Information was organized with a viewpoint that lead to a conclusion; APA format was usually followed |
Information was organized, but lacked a clear viewpoint or argument; conclusion was not well supported; flaws in APA format were noted |
Information was disorganized or irrelevant and lacked a discernible viewpoint; no clearly stated conclusion |
Amount of information |
All topics were addressed with abundant detail |
All topics were addressed with moderate detail, but no section was richly detailed |
Topics were addressed, but detail was basic or missing |
One or more topics were not addressed |
Sources |
A variety of primary & secondary sources were used, but evidence from primary sources is emphasized |
Although primary and secondary sources were used, some were used excessively |
Minimal use of primary sources; evidence from secondary sources was emphasized |
Almost all evidence was from secondary sources |
APA Citation format |
All sources were accurately cited in APA format, including References and in-text documentation |
Almost all sources are accurately cited & documented according to the standards for APA format |
The majority of the sources are accurately cited & documented, according to APA format |
Numerous improper citations appear; no in-text documentation appears |
Category/ Assessment |
Excellent (1.5) |
Above Average (1.0) |
Average (0.5) |
Below Average (0) |
APA Format |
Title page, appearance (indents, running heads), margins, sections, headings, and subheads are all created accurately |
Elements mostly created accurately; 1-2 insignificant errors |
3-4 errors |
Too many errors |
Mechanics |
The mechanics, including sentence structure and transitions, were effortless; sentence and vocabulary variety free of errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation |
The mechanics were well-formed so that no meaning was lost; there was sentence and vocabulary variety, but there were minor errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation |
The mechanics were adequate, but sentence and vocabulary variety was minimal; several grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors appeared |
The mechanics were ill formed so that meaning was lost; sentence structure and vocabulary was repetitious or trite; numerous serious errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation appeared. |
Final Copy Format |
(All) Typed, double-spaced, correct headings, on time |
(Three) Typed, doubled-spaced, correct headings, on time |
(Two) Typed, doubled-spaced, correct headings, on time |
(Disinterested): not typed, single-spaced, no heading, late |
Totals: |
|
|
|
|
Summary Total (Max = 15) |
|
|
|
|
Category/ Assessment |
Excellent (1.5) |
Above Average (1.0) |
Average (0.5) |
Below Average (0) |
Introduction & Topic |
|
|
|
|
Thesis—regarding one artist’s influence over another |
|
|
|
|
Interpretation |
|
|
|
|
Organization |
|
|
|
|
Amount of information |
|
|
|
|
Sources |
|
|
|
|
APA Citation format |
|
|
|
|
APA Format |
|
|
|
|
Mechanics |
|
|
|
|
Final Copy Format |
|
|
|
|
Totals: |
|
|
|
|
Summary Total (Max = 15) |
|
|
|
|