Skip to main content
iRubric: Listening Assignment Summer Speech Course rubric

iRubric: Listening Assignment Summer Speech Course rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Listening Assignment Summer Speech Course 
Outside Speech Review
Students must keep a listening journal for a minimum of four hours, with listening variations. Evaluate the type of listening (appreciative, empathetic, comprehensive, or critical), identify good and bad listening habits, identify zone out periods, and identify goals for improving listening skills. Should be between 250-500 words.
Rubric Code: UX3X563
By DrJDeTore
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Outside Speech Review
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Unsatisfactory

(N/A)

Introduction

Excellent

Begins with a motivating opening, then provides a brief summary of listening assignment and what was learned. Provides a thesis and blueprint of points to be discussed.
Good

Summary is either a little too long or not long enough but provides a motivating opening ;and writer's evaluation with criterion.
Fair

Summary is either much too short or much too long; may be vague or tell too much; few details presentation and little evidence from summary to support reviewer’s opinion
Unsatisfactory

Little or no significant summary; no details and no blue pring.
Evaluation of listening skills

Provides an analysis of listening skills in a four hour period.
Excellent

Contains ample information that identifies the type of listening done (appreciative, comprehensive, empathetic, and/or critical)
Good

Contains sufficient information that identifies the type of listening done (appreciative, comprehensive, empathetic, and/or critical
Fair

Contains insufficient information that identifies the type of listening done (appreciative, comprehensive, empathetic, and/or critical
Unsatisfactory

Too vague and/or missing.
Listening Habits Identified

Identifies the good and bad listening habits and when they occur and in what type of listening styles they are most frequent.
Excellent

Contains ample information that identifies the good and bad listening habits and in which listening style they most frequently occur.
Good

Contains sufficient information hat identifies the good and bad listening habits and in which listening style they most frequently occur.
Fair

Contains insufficient information hat identifies the good and bad listening habits and in which listening style they most frequently occur.
Unsatisfactory

Too vague and/or missing.
Zone outs

Student identifies zone out periods and in what type of listening style they most frequently occur
Excellent

Student notes the zone out periods and posits why they occur.
Good

Student mentions zone out periods but the analysis of why is not sufficient.
Fair

Student mentions zone out periods but offers no analysis of them.
Unsatisfactory

Too vague and/or missing.
Goals for Listening

Excellent

Mentions three goals for listening in the future and how to accomplish it.
Good

Lists two goals for listening and how to accomplish it.
Fair

Lists two goals or more for listening but does not mention how to accomplish it.
Unsatisfactory

Too vague and/or missing.
Effective organization and flow

Excellent

Essay is strongly organized with clear transitions and logical connections that create a sense of being tightly woven together. Well-developed conclusion. Grammar, spelling, and style is college-level.
Good

Essay is organized and most transitions and connections are clear, but either organization is somewhat lacking or some grammar, spelling or style problems.Excellent conclusion.
Fair

Essay lacks strong organization ; jumps around too much or lacks effective transitions; not in logical order. Grammar, spelling, style is below college-level. Conclusion is underdeveloped.
Unsatisfactory

Essay is choppy or not cohesive; organization is unclear; few effective transitions or none at all. Many grammatical, spelling, and stylistic errors. Missing conclusion.
Length

Excellent

At least 500 words.
Good

At least 350 words
Fair

At least 250 words
Unsatisfactory

Less than 250 words
Overall Evaluation

Excellent

Excellent college-level analysis of presenter with sophisticated use of rhetoric, vocabulary, and specific details. Well-written, supported, and organized.
Good

Above average college-level analysis of presenter with mostly sophisticated use of rhetoric, vocabulary, and specific details. Well-written, supported, and organized.
Fair

Fair analysis that lacks specificity or is simply too short to do the subject justice. Not college-level.
Unsatisfactory

A failure due to length or execution. Under 250 words. Not college-level writing.



Keywords:
  • At the end of the lesson the students will be able to comprehend a film review.



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98