Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Policy Analysis Paper Grading Rubric

iRubric: Policy Analysis Paper Grading Rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
Policy Analysis Paper Grading Rubric 
You will critically analyze a healthcare policy and write a position paper that outlines recommendations for policy changes that incorporates use of persuasive arguments and critical thinking.
Rubric Code: Q373A4
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)


Powered by iRubric Policy Analysis
  Poor

16 pts

Fair

21 pts

Good

30 pts

Define the Problem
5 pts

Poor

(59% credit or less)The problem statement contains many errors of assertion and/or has been omitted altogether. The solution has been defined in the problem.
Fair

(70% Credit) The problem statement is adequate.
Good

(100% credit) The problem is defined in a way that is easily evaluated and can be quanitified.
Assemble the Evidence
10 pts

Poor

Poor discussion of laws and public policy issues relevant to the topic. No evidence is given or the evidence is incorrect or unrelated to the assertion.
Fair

Adequate discussion of laws and public policy issues relevant to the topic. An answer at this level provides few arguments, but the ones that are presented are reasonable. There is evidence offered for each thought, although the paper may be overlooking some of the more minor supporting assertions.
Good

Excellent discussion of laws and public policy issues relevant to the topic. An answer at this level provides clear statements of the thoughts being asserted in a logical order that builds to the final conclusion. Each thought is accompanied by sufficient reasonable evidence to support it.
Construct the Alternatives
10 pts

Poor

No attempt or a weak attempt is made to introduce or refute counterarguments.
Fair

Several of the more obvious counterarguements are raised and refuted.
Good

Each thought also considers and counters reasonable arguments against it.
Technical Style and APA Format
5 pts

Poor

The order of presentation is confusing, and is not logical or convincing. Lots of Grammer and punctuation problems, paper does not follow APA format.
Fair

The order of presentation is adequate. Transitions between thoughts are adquate. Minor amount of grammer and punctuation errors; some minor problems with APA format use.
Good

The thoughts proposed in the policy analysis are clear, stand together and are internally consistent with one another. Adequate number of citations from peer reviewed and or other respected sources. Correct citation style as defined by the APA manual.



Keywords:
  • Policy Analysis

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2021 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n17