- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Literature Circle rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Literature Circle rubric Literature Circle Job rubric Assesses students productivity and participation within literature circles. Rubric Code: P385CC By maryleafree Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Reading Grade Levels: (none)

Literature Circles
	Good 5 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
Questions	Good Wrote at least 3 interesting questions to discuss with the group. The questions were challenging and thought provoking.	Fair Wrote 3 questions to share with the group. The questions weren't challenging and had simple answers.	Poor Provided less that 3 questions. Questions had simple and/or yes/no answers.
Vocabulary	Good Found 5 new, unique, or interesting words to discuss. I provided page numbers and clear, easy to understand definitions for each word.	Fair Found 3-4 new unique, or interesting words. I provided page numbers and defintions for each word.	Poor Found 2 or fewer new, unique or interesting words. Page numbers missing and/or unclear definitions.
Illustration	Good Illustrated an interesting scene from the story. Color and detail added to illustration. Included short paragraph explaining why you chose the scene.	Fair Illustrated a scene from the book. Illustration missing color and/or details. Explanation of why the scene was chosen is not written in paragraph form.	Poor Illustrated a scene from the story. Illustration is missing color and detail. No explanation for choosing the scene is provided.
Summarize	Good Wrote thorough summary of the section. Included only major ideas and events. Summary is in correct sequence and contains accurate information.	Fair Wrote summary of the section. Included some minor details along with major ideas and events. Information is accurate, but out of order.	Poor Summary missing major ideas and events from section. Focused on too many minor details. Information is inaccurate and/or out of order.
Discussion Participation	Good Was a positive contributor in discussions. Provided insightful comments and questions. Listened to others and didn't dominate the discussion.	Fair Contributed to group discussions. Comments and questions weren't always thought out. Either dominated the discussion or needed to participate more at times.	Poor Poor contributor to discussions. Comments were off task and distracting to grouop.