- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: WEEKLY DISCUSSION POSTINGS rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
WEEKLY DISCUSSION POSTINGS WEEKLY DISCUSSION POSTINGS CREATED OCTOBER 2020 Rubric Code: P2XA933 By hzubalsky Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Criterion
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good- Excellent (N/A)	Points Earned (N/A)
Submission 10 pts On the due date. More than 2 weeks late- no point award.	Poor 2 weeks late: 0 points	Fair 1 weeks late: 5 points	Good- Excellent Submitted on time- 10 points	Points Earned
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 15 pts	Poor - Initial post and replies contain numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors. - Language uses jargon or conversational tone. 0-5 points	Fair - Initial post and replies contain some grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors. - Language lacks some clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone. 6-9 points	Good- Excellent Initial post and replies- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are generally followed; spelling generally is correct. - Language generally is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure. 10-15 points	Points Earned
Format 15 pts	Poor - Discussion post and replies have few or none of the formatting requirements from the instructions. 0-5 points.	Fair - Discussion post and replies have some formatting elements missing from the instructions. Discussion post and replies are basically formatted as per the instructions. 6-14 points.	Good- Excellent - Discussion post and replies are formatted as per the instructions. 15 points.	Points Earned
Content & Development 60 pts	Poor -The initial post and replies are not engaging or creating interest. - Content is incomplete. - Major points are not clear and /or persuasive. 0-34 points	Fair -The initial post and replies create interest and are fairly well developed. Not very engaging. - Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive. - Major points are addressed, but not well supported and/or developed. - Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought. 35-39 points	Good- Excellent - Well developed initial post and replies. Formatted as per the instructions. They engage the reader and create interest. - Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. - Major points are stated clearly and are well supported. - Content and purpose of the writing are clear. 40-60 points	Points Earned