Skip to main content
iRubric: WEEKLY DISCUSSION POSTINGS rubric

iRubric: WEEKLY DISCUSSION POSTINGS rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
WEEKLY DISCUSSION POSTINGS 
CREATED OCTOBER 2020
Rubric Code: P2XA933
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Poor

(N/A)

Fair

(N/A)

Good- Excellent

(N/A)

Points Earned

(N/A)

Submission
10 pts

On the due date. More than 2 weeks late- no point award.

Poor

2 weeks late:

0 points
Fair

1 weeks late:

5 points
Good- Excellent

Submitted on time-

10 points
Points Earned
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
15 pts

Poor

- Initial post and replies contain numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.


0-5 points
Fair

- Initial post and replies contain some grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks some clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.

6-9 points
Good- Excellent

Initial post and replies- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are generally followed; spelling generally is correct.
- Language generally is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.

10-15 points
Points Earned
Format
15 pts

Poor

- Discussion post and replies have few or none of the formatting requirements from the instructions.



0-5 points.
Fair

- Discussion post and replies have some formatting elements missing from the instructions. Discussion post and replies are basically formatted as per the instructions.

6-14 points.
Good- Excellent

- Discussion post and replies are formatted as per the instructions.




15 points.
Points Earned
Content & Development
60 pts

Poor

-The initial post and replies are not engaging or creating interest.
- Content is incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.







0-34 points
Fair

-The initial post and replies create interest and are fairly well developed. Not very engaging.
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported and/or developed.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.


35-39 points
Good- Excellent

- Well developed initial post and replies. Formatted as per the instructions. They engage the reader and create interest.
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.

40-60 points
Points Earned










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2021 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n17