Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: The Crucible Presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
The Crucible Presentation
The Crucible PPT
Group Research project over one of six topics: McCarthyism, Puritans, Salem Witch Trials, Protestant Reformation, Religion, Arthur Miller
Rubric Code:
MXX3972
By
dzeman1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
The Crucible PPT
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Presentation
Poor
Presenters were unprepared, did not know their subject or content material, could not answer questions about the material. Projects were sloppy, had no logical order, could not be easily read and understood by the audience.
Fair
Presenters did not know the content of their presentation, struggled with answering questions. Projects were sloppy and somewhat confusing to the audience.
Good
Presenters were familiar with the content of their presentation and could answer questions. Projects were visually appealing and easily understood by the audience.
Excellent
Presenters were able to engage the audience, did not have to read directly from the project, knew their content material, were able to answer questions. Projects were visually appealing, flowed in a logical manner, and were easily understood by the audience.
Research
Poor
No research was done.
Fair
One or two sources were used, but the information was incorrect, or a single web page, i.e. Wikipedia or ask.com, was cited for two or more sources. Little to no information was given for each topic.
Good
Three different sources were used, but the information was not totally accurate. There was no duplication of sources for different information, i.e. a single web page or book cited for different reasons. Little to no information was given for some of the topics, while others received more attention in the presentation.
Excellent
Three or more sources were used, the information was accurate, there was no duplication of sources for different information, i.e. a single web page or book cited for different reasons. An equal amount of time was spent explaining each topic.
Group Participation
Poor
Group member did not participate in any aspect of the presentation.
Fair
Group member offered limited contribution to one aspect of the presentation: some help in the area of research, PPT design, or presentation of material.
Good
Group member either participated significantly on one aspect of the presentation, or participated fully on all aspects of the presentation.
Excellent
Group member participated fully on all aspects of the presentation, or completely fulfilled all of the requirements for one aspect of the presentation; i.e. designed the PPT, compiled all of the research, or gave the presentation.
Length
Poor
Significantly over or under the 5 minute limit; i.e. under 1 minutes or over 10.
Fair
Significantly over or under the time limit; i.e. under 2 minutes or over 8.
Good
Moderately over or under the 5 minute time limit; i.e. under 3 minutes or over 7 minutes.
Excellent
Within the 5 minute time limit.
Organization
Poor
Group was not prepared to give the presentation, did not turn in the presentation by the required due date, and could not produce a copy of the presentation for the class or the teacher within a reasonable amount of time before the presentations. Group members were disorganized, did not know who was presenting, or who had the presentation on the date the presentation was assigned.
Fair
Group members did not turn in the presentation on or before the due date, did not know who was presenting, or who had the presentation on the date the presentation was assigned, but could access the presentation for the class and to turn in on the date of the presentation.
Good
The group was prepared to give the presentation; knew who was presenting and was prepared to turn in the materials in class.
Excellent
The group was prepared to give the presentation; knew who was presenting, and had turned in their assignment on or before the due date.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.