Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Architectural Working Drawings rubric

iRubric: Architectural Working Drawings rubric

 
find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
Architectural Working Drawings 
Students will use knowledge, skills and contents learned in CADD taken throughout their five semesters. Given a client based specifics and several site options, students are to prepare and complete a working set of Drawings. A summary report on the project is to be presented orally to the class.
Rubric Code: EXX2B9B
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric Architectural Working Drawings
% Three separate grades will be derived from this rubric for the different stages of the project.
 

(N/A)


(N/A)


(N/A)


(N/A)

Preliminary Project
5 %
  Unsatisfactory

25 pts

Below Standard

50 pts

Meets Standard

75 pts

Meets or Exceeds

100 pts

Initial Plans
20 %

Floor plans w/wall thickness, room sizes, overall dimensions and window/door locations. Front elevation sketch

Unsatisfactory

Failure to Present any of required criteria:
Below Standard

Presentation of some required criteria (3 or more missing) floor plans with wall thickness, room sizes/names,overall dimensions and window/door locations. front sketch
Meets Standard

Presentation of most required criteria (1-2 missing) floor plans with wall thickness, room sizes/names,overall dimensions and window/door locations. front sketch
Meets or Exceeds

Presentation of all required criteria: floor plans with wall thickness, room sizes/names,overall dimensions and window/door locations. front sketch
Accuracy of Design
30 %

Proper traffic flow,
structural continuity,
matching clients expectations, realistic functionality.

Unsatisfactory

not much thought in layout. no equipment accommodations, poor traffic flow, most of the clients request were not met. There are many issues with structural integrity, The functionality of the spaces does not work.
Below Standard

not much thought in layout. there are inadequate equipment accommodations, poor traffic flow, most of the clients request were met. There are some issues with structural integrity, The functionality of some of the spaces does not work well.
Meets Standard

Carefully thought out layout. there are equipment accommodations, traffic flow works okay,most of the clients request were met. There are no issues with structural integrity, The functionality of all the spaces works well.
Meets or Exceeds

Carefully thought out layout. Proper equipment accommodations, traffic flow works well, the clients request were all met. There are no issues with structural integrity, The functionality of all the spaces works well.
Project Research Grade
50 %
  unsatisfactory

25 pts

Below Standard

50 pts

Meets Standard

75 pts

Above Standard

100 pts

Participation in class
50 %

drawing/reviewing initial plans. Asking questions throughout revisions and final drafting. progressing steadily through final drawings stage

unsatisfactory

most time in class was not spent working on initial plans,rough drafts, reviews w/instructor. Constant required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 3+ days of the required class time.
Below Standard

Some of Time in class spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing w/instructor and making revisions. frequently, required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 3+ days of the required class time.
Meets Standard

Most of Time in class spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing w/instructor and making revisions. Occasionally, required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 1-2 days of the required class time.
Above Standard

Time in classroom spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing with instructor and making revisions. Very good self time management displayed throughout the entire project start to completion. Present for entire class requirements
Research of Project
50 %

Specifications
Fire and ADA Egress Site Requirements
Building limits/restrictions
Type of construction
Type/amount of occupancy. Fixture requirements etc....

unsatisfactory

No research was completed, nothing documented. To ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for the project, everything would need to be researched further.
Below Standard

little research was completed, nothing documented. To ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for the project, more than 3 would need to be researched further.
Meets Standard

some research was completed/documented to ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for most of the project. 1-2 of the needed specifications were overlooked.
Above Standard

Thorough research was completed/documented to ensure proper codes/restrictions were followed for entire project
Final Plans
40 %
  Unsatifactory

(N/A)

Below Standard

(N/A)

Meets Standard

(N/A)

Meets or Exceeds

(N/A)

Overall Impression
25 %

Neatness
completeness
on schedule
comprehensiveness

Unsatifactory

Working set of drawings is less than 80% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is not assembled properly, not understandable, no organization. Not submitted on time.
Below Standard

Working set of drawings is between 80-100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is assembled properly, understandable, neatly done. Not submitted on time.
Meets Standard

Working set of drawings is less than 100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is assembled properly, understandable, neatly done and submitted on time.
Meets or Exceeds

Working set of drawings is 100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is assembled properly, understandable, neatly done and submitted on time.
Dimensioning notes/labels
25 %

dimensions accurate
dimensions complete
notes accurate
notes complete
schedules complete

Unsatifactory

No Dimensions were present on the project. Schedules were incomplete or inaccurate schedules.
Below Standard

Dimensions were present on the some of the project with inaccuracies that effected overall understanding. All schedules were completed but with some inaccuracies.
Meets Standard

Dimensions were present on the majority of the project with several inaccuracies that did not effect overall understanding. All schedules were completed.
Meets or Exceeds

Great time and effort was spent to ensure 100 % accurate notes/dimensions throughout the entire project. All schedules were completed and accurate.
Presentation
5 %
  Unsatisfactory

25 pts

Below Standard

50 pts

Meets Standard

75 pts

Above Standard

100 pts

Final Summary Report
40 %

- written summary describes all required aspects of plan(s)
dimensions listed and square footage is accurately computed etc...

Unsatisfactory

Written summary does not describe required aspects of plan(s)
Summary is not understandable, shows improper grammar and not adequate for the presentation
Below Standard

Written summary describes some required aspects of plan(s)
Summary is not-completely understandable, shows improper grammar,adequate for the presentation
Meets Standard

Written summary describes most required aspects of plan(s)
Summary is understandable, shows proper grammar and appropriate for the presentation
Above Standard

Written summary describes all required aspects of plan(s)
Summary is understandable, shows proper grammar and appropriate for the presentation
Presentation
60 %

- stands up straight and speaks loudly and clearly
- shows understanding of topic
- 3 to 5 minutes in length
- shows enthusiasm and confidence
- uses appropriate vocabulary

Unsatisfactory

Presentation was poorly executed. lacked enthusiasm and confidence. Was not the proper length of time. Showed no understanding of project. Did not speak clearly or use appropriate grammar.
Below Standard

Presentation was not well executed. lacked enthusiasm and confidence. Was not the proper length of time. Showed some understanding of project. spoke clearly but not appropriate grammar.
Meets Standard

Presentation was well executed. lacked a little enthusiasm and confidence. The proper length of time. Showed some understanding of project. spoke clearly, and appropriately
Above Standard

Presentation was well executed. showing great enthusiasm and confidence. The proper length of time. Showed great understanding of project. spoke clearly, loudly and appropriately



Keywords:
  • floor plans, working drawing, house layout, blueprints,dimensions,elevations


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2020 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n17