Skip to main content
iRubric: Spanish 4 P v I Spanish Game rubric

iRubric: Spanish 4 P v I Spanish Game rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Spanish 4 P v I Spanish Game 
Semester FINAL Project: Spanish (Board) Game
Objetivo: Crear un juego que practica el pretérito y el imperfecto para otros estudiantes. ¡Yo usaré el mejor juego este semestre con nivel 3 estudiantes!
Rubric Code: EX3C892
By hdwalters
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Academic Content
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

13 pts

Super

20 pts

# Questions?Answers - Rough Draft

Poor

3 or more: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
Fair

2 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
Good

1 of the following: late, incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
Super

On time, thorough, relevant, good range of difficulty, show attention to detail, answers are accurate.
Accuracy of Content

Poor

Several pieces made for the game game are not accurate. It is unclear as to if the group understands the uses of P and I.
Fair

All but 2 of the informational pieces made for the game are correct.
It is somewhat clear the the group understands the P and I and how to present the information.
Good

All but one of the information cards made for the game are correct. P and I are well understood.
Super

All information cards made for the game are correct. Exellent uses of preterit and imperfect.
Instructional Effectiveness

Poor

The content is incidental. One can play without learning much.
Fair

Significant cognitive effort is spent on things that make the difficult to use as an instructional resource.
Good

Winning and learning are closely entwined, though some mental effort is spent on aspects that are just about the game.
Super

Winning the game requires learning the content. The two are matched completely.
Knowledge Gained

Poor

Several students in group could NOT correctly answer without looking up additional information.
Fair

Most students in group could easily and correctly participate in the game without looking at additional resources.
Good

All students in group could easily and correctly participate.
Super

All students in group could easily and correctly participate without looking at the game.
Use of Spanish

Poor

Irrevelant to the purpose and objective.
Fair

This Spanish is either:

A. Well over your head and shows signs of outside help.

B. Below average for the level you should be at.
Good

Most of the board, rules, etc. presented in Spanish with English translations if necessary.
It is your Spanish but some Spanish is not level appropriate
Super

Board, rules, etc. presented in Spanish with English translations if necessary.
This Spanish is totally appropriate for level 3. It is clearly your Spanish without cheating by using outside sources or plagriarism.
Participation (within group, ranked

Poor

Almost none.
Fair

Limited; made no effort to increase your own knowledge to help out.
Good

Made some effort but still left partner with the brunt of the work.
Super

Particpated fully and found ways to build on knowledge through process and/or helped partner gain more knowledge as well.
The Game Itself
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

5 pts

Good

7 pts

Super

10 pts

Rules

Poor

Unwritten.
Fair

Rules were written, but people had some difficulty figuring out the game.
Good

Rules were written, but one part of the game needed slightly more explanation.
Super

Rules were written completely and clearly enough so that all could easily participate.
Creativity

Poor

Little thought was put into making the game interesting and fun.
Fair

The group tried to make the game interesting and fun, but some of the things made it hard to understand/enjoy the game.
Good

The group put some thought into making the game intersting and fun to play by interesting game peices or objective
Super

The group put a lot of thought into making the game fun and interesting to play as shown by creative questions, game pieces, and/or game board.
Others' Reactions

Poor

Ranked as unplayable.
Fair

Thought the game could use further development and then could be engaging.
Good

Found the game somewhat engaging and worthwhile, might play again!
Super

Found the game engaging and worthwhile, would play again!
Presentation of the Game

Poor

All group members<BR>
participated in the instrumentation of the game, understood the rules and objectives, and are able to communicate this with this class.
Fair

Member did not fully understand the instrumentation and objects of the game and was not totally prepared to communicate this with the class.
Good

Member had only a vague understanding of the instrumentation and objectives of the game and was not prepared to communicate with the class.
Super

Member had no role in communicating with the class.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98