Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Annotated Bibliography Annotated Bibliography Grade distribution for Annotated Bibliography. Rubric Code: EB9CW7 By nbiggs Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Annotated Bibliography Paper
	Poor 2 pts	Needs Improvement 3 pts	Average 4 pts	Exceptional 5 pts
Overall Format 10 pts This section is 5% of the overall grade.	Poor Work sloppy, directions/formatting not followed.	Needs Improvement Some attempt to follow directions/formatting noted with major errors	Average Attempted to follow directions/formatting with some errors	Exceptional Followed directions/formatting with few to no errors
Topic Complexity 15 pts This section is 10% of the overall grade.	Poor Simple topic without depth	Needs Improvement Simple topic with beginning level of depth	Average Good topic with good possibility of development	Exceptional Topic has been thought out and developed
Introduction and Thesis Statement 15 pts This section is 10% of the overall grade.	Poor Lacks detail and analysis	Needs Improvement Has some detail but lacks analysis	Average Good development of detail with some analysis	Exceptional Good development of detail and analysis
Citation Format 10 pts Citation is graded as 5% of the overall grade. (Total 5%)	Poor Format not followed	Needs Improvement Format attempted (or incorrect format), not consistent	Average Format attempted (or incorrect format) but consistent	Exceptional Format followed, few errors
Citation Summaries Each (of 5) citation is graded as 5% of the overall grade. (Total 25%)
	Poor Summary lacks analysis or depth, shows no understanding of material 2 pts	Needs Improvement Summary has some analysis, but lacks depth, shows some understanding of material 3 pts	Average Summary has sufficient analysis and depth, shows some understanding of material 4 pts	Excellent Summary has good analysis and depth, shows good understanding of material 5 pts
Reference 1 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent
Reference 2 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent
Reference 3 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent
Reference 4 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent
Citation Relevance Each (of 5) citation is graded as 5% of the overall grade. (Total 25%)
	Poor Shows no understanding of how material relates to topic with no analysis or depth 2 pts	Needs Improvement Shows some understanding of material relates to topic with some analysis and depth 3 pts	Average Shows good understanding of material and how it relates to topic with sufficient analysis and depth 4 pts	Excellent Has good analysis and depth, shows good understanding of material as it relates to topic with good analysis and depth 5 pts
Reference 1 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent
Reference 2 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent
Reference 3 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent
Reference 4 5 pts	Poor	Needs Improvement	Average	Excellent

Subjects:

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Humanities rubrics

More Writing rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16