Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Case Study rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Case Study
Case Study
Business Law: Case Analysis
Rubric Code:
E5W352
By
chaniseals
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Law
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Case Brief
Exemplary
(N/A)
Effective
(N/A)
Minimal
(N/A)
Unsatisfactory
(N/A)
Statement of Facts
Exemplary
All "Key" facts are recorded and organized in an extremely neat and orderly fashion. (Paragragh form)
Effective
Relevant facts are recorded legibly and are somewhat organized. However, Some key facts are missing.
Minimal
Facts are recorded and legible but are not in paragraph form.
Unsatisfactory
Facts are not recorded.
What are the relevant issues?
Exemplary
All issues/relevant disputes are addressed (Plaintiff/Defendant)
Effective
Some issues/relevant disputes are addressed. (e.g. Listing the issues presented by one party instead of both)
Minimal
Less than half of all relevant and issues are addressed.
Unsatisfactory
No issues are cited.
What Rule of Law was involved?
Exemplary
Correct Rule of Law provided and stated accurately when providing rule explanation.
Effective
Correct Rule of Law provided with inaccuracies in rule explanation.
Minimal
Incorrect Rule of Law provided with inaccurate rule explanation.
Unsatisfactory
No rule of law cited or legal citation.
Rule Application/Analysis
Exemplary
Analysis provided for each relevant rule and applicable fact.
Effective
Analysis provided. However, student fails to identify how each rule applies to key facts.
Minimal
Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given.
Unsatisfactory
Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic.
Conclusion
Exemplary
Student effectively ties analysis to conclusion.Student provides definitive conclusion by transitioning clearly from the analysis provided.
Effective
Student provides definitive conclusion. However, conclusion does not coincide or effectively transition from the analysis provided.
Minimal
Conclusion provided without explanation or transition.
Unsatisfactory
Conclusion not provided.
Keywords:
Case Brief, Legal, Case Study
Subjects:
Law
Types:
Homework
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Law rubrics
More Homework rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.