Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Final Paper: Historical Context rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Final Paper: Historical Context
Analysis of Persuasive Ad Assignment
Rubric Code:
D8B8A3
By
julieeprice
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Final Paper: Historical Context
100 %
Excellent
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Poor
(N/A)
Context/ideology/Purpose
20 pts
Excellent
-Clear, logical, comprehensive discussion of the context and purpose of the message.
-research includes multiple sources of analysis of news events, facts surveys for complete
background of situation
Good
-Discussion of the context and purpose of the message.
-research includes 1-2 sources
Fair
-Incomplete discussion of the context or purpose of the message
-discussion without research
-little discussion or evidence from past campaigns
Poor
-Incomplete discussion of the context or purpose of the message
Source Credibility
20 pts
Excellent
complete background of source in context of message. comprehensive research of prior campaigns from source or institution-
-Analysis of source credibility:
-Includes research regarding leadership structure of organization or propagandist
-Discussion of multiple theories regarding source credibility
-Analysis of source credibility in regards to effectiveness of message
Good
-research used to background source
-history of past campaigns included without sufficient analysis
-some discussion of importance of source credibility
Fair
minimal research used to background source
-minimal theory or analysis regarding importance of source credibility
Poor
superficial information regarding source
-missing either discussion of source credibility theories or importance of source credibility
Resonance
20 pts
Excellent
Description of target audience -complete discussion of prevalent values, myths,beliefs of target audience
-research includes an analysis of existing behaviors, norms, beliefs from a 2-3 sources
Good
Description of target audience . complete discussion of prevalent values, myths,beliefs but with minimal research from variety of sources
Fair
Description of target audience without complete discussion of prevalent values, myths,beliefs
Poor
Description of target audience without much analysis of existing behaviors, norms, beliefs
Theories related to message
20 pts
Excellent
-clear, logical discussion of several propaganda theories related to effects, reactions, counterpropaganda, or backlash expected -discussion of how messages are linked to values, beliefs. etc
Good
- discussion of propaganda theories . Minimal discussion of reactions, counterpropaganda,possibility of backlash etc
overview without much analysis on which values, beliefs link to messages
-
Fair
, minimal discussion of propaganda theories, techniques and concepts
- a cursory discussion of of reactions, counterpropaganda,possibility of backlash etc
-minimum discussion of why message will resonate with target
Poor
-omission of discussion of propaganda theories, techniques and concepts
- a cursory discussion of of reactions, counterpropaganda,possibility of backlash etc
-minimum or no discussion of why message will resonate with target
AP/MLA style
20 pts
Excellent
--Assignment is written using AP style and MLA citations in both paper and bibliography.
-- No errors in format or punctuation,precise word choice.
--No spelling or capitalization errors
Good
--Assignment is written using AP style and MLA citations in paper and bibliography.
-- 2 errors in format, citation or punctuation.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling or capitalization errors.
Fair
--Assignment loosely follows AP style with MLA citations. Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
- Correct word choice.
-- More than 3 format, spelling, punctuation or capitalization errors.
Poor
-Assignment does not adhere to AP style and MLA citations.Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- More than than 4 errors in format, spelling,
punctuation or capitalization errors.
Keywords:
Research paper - emphasis on relevance of research
Subjects:
Communication
English
Education
Types:
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.