Skip to main content
iRubric: Journal Entry Rubric

iRubric: Journal Entry Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Journal Entry Rubric 
This rubric details the grading of the student's journalling entries for their webQuest.
Rubric Code: B46668
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Geography  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Journal Entry Rubric
  Poor 1

(N/A)

Fair 2

(N/A)

Good 3

(N/A)

Excellent 4

(N/A)

Journal Entry

Poor 1

Details in the entry give little to no detail, do not relate to the websites that have been read, and reflect little understanding of the assignment or city visited.
Fair 2

Details in the entry give some information to the reader though they may not relate back to the websites that were read they do reflect some understanding of assignment or city visited.
Good 3

Details in the entry give the reader important information. The information relates back to the websites that were read and reflects an understanding of the assignment, city visited, and their culture.
Excellent 4

Details in the entry give the reader important information. The information relates back to the websites that were read and reflects an understanding of the culture and city visited. The entry includes a comparison of your culture and the culture visited comparing similiarites and differences.
Convention

Poor 1

Little to none of the handwriting can be read and it is not understandable.
Fair 2

Most of the handwriting can be read but with difficulty and is hard to understand.
Good 3

The handwriting is legible and can be read without hesitating; the entry is understandable.
Excellent 4

The handwriting is legible, easily read, and understandable.
Organization

Poor 1

Organization of ideas is so fractured that it takes away from the content and makes it difficult for the reader to understand what has been written.
Fair 2

Ideas are organized somewhat clearly, but the organization could be improved upon.
Good 3

Ideas are organized in a clear and meaningful way. They flow and properly represent the point-of-view of someone really traveling and experiencing the city being journaled.
Excellent 4

Ideas are organized logically, clearly, and in a meaningful manner. The ideas flow in a consistent way from beginning to conclusion and accurately portray the beliefs, point-of-view, or city being journaled, and the connection to your own culture is relevant and meaningful.
Word Choice and grammar

Poor 1

Language used is dull and plain. It does not use voice and uses few adjectives. There are significant and numerous mistakes in grammar.
Fair 2

Language used expresses voice, but does not use many descriptive words and there are numerous errors in grammar.
Good 3

The language used expresses voice and uses descriptive words which paint pictures in the readers mind, very few grammar errors.
Excellent 4

The language used expresses voice, uses highly descriptive, relevant, and meaningful words which paint highly compelling pictures in the readers mind. Perfect grammar or no more than one grammar error.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16