Skip to main content
iRubric: Movement Against Genocide Research and Exhibition Project rubric

iRubric: Movement Against Genocide Research and Exhibition Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Movement Against Genocide Research and Exhibition Project 
Your primary task is to research a form of genocide and design a display for the exhibition that educates and motivates people to speak up and act against genocide and violence based on peoples’ differences. In the process you can also research any other acts of violence that you think people should be informed about.
Rubric Code: A8767B
By WaWatson
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Movement Against Genocide Exhibit
  Exceeding

10 pts

Meeting

9 pts

Approaching

7 pts

Beginning

6 pts

Research

Exceeding

Research is extremely detailed and organized. At least 3 different sources were used and listed in a references section. At least. 8-10 details were included that cover the causes, effects, and 5Ws+how of the event.
Meeting

Research is detailed and organized. At least 3 different sources were used and listed in a references section. At least 6-8 details were included that covers the causes, effects, and 5Ws+how of the event.
Approaching

There is evidence that some research was done. 3-6 details were included, but does not give a complete sense of the event. Materials are somewhat disorganized.
Beginning

Research is disorganized or missing. Fewer than 3 details are included and there is no real sense of understanding of the event.
Paraphrase

Exceeding

The final product is well paraphrased and clearly expressed in your own language. There are no signs of plagiarism. It is clear that care was taken to make sure that you understood the details being communicated.
Meeting

The final product shows signs of paraphrasing. Some areas might show signs of words replaced here and there rather than completely in your own words. There are no signs of plagiarism.
Approaching

The final product shows an attempt at paraphrasing. Some of the paraphrased language might sound similar to the original language.
Beginning

Paraphrasing was not done with care. There are some examples of possible plagiarism.
Analysis

Exceeding

Strong analysis of why the example of genocide occurred. Makes strong connections to the Holocaust or other forms of genocide.. Explains why this form of genocide is terrible and the impact it can have on others.
Meeting

Provides an adequate analysis of why the example of genocide occurred. Makes some connections to the Holocaust or other forms of genocide. Explains why this form of genocide is terrible and the impact it can have on others.
Approaching

Some analysis of why this form of genocide occurred. No connections to other forms of genocide or the Holocaust. Might capture the horror of the genocide, but no real discussion of the impact it has on others.
Beginning

No real analysis of why this form of genocide occurred. No connections to other forms of genocide. No real analysis of its horror or impact.
Final product

Exceeding

Final product is extremely creative and neatly done. The person went outside of his/her comfort zone to create the product. It uses an appropriate format to communicate a message.
Meeting

The final product is creative and neat. It uses an engaging format to communicate a message.
Approaching

The final product is somewhat creative and neat. It might communicate a message, but is not engaging.
Beginning

The final product is not creative or neat. It is not very engaging.
Recommendation

Exceeding

Provides strong recommendations to encourage people to work to end and prevent genocide. Moves the reader deeply connect and think differently about the subject.
Meeting

Provides reasonable recommendations to encourage people to work to end and prevent genocide. Helps the reader connect and think about the subject.
Approaching

Provides some recommendations. Doesn't really move the reader to make connections.
Beginning

Minimal to no recommendations offered. Doesn't help the reader think or connect.
Final presentation

Exceeding

Speaks clearly and with confidence. Answers most of the questions people might have, showing sufficient research was done.
Meeting

Speaks clearly and with confidence. Answers some of the questions people might have.
Approaching

Speaks somewhat clearly. Could show more confidence. Answers a few of the questions asked.
Beginning

Speech is unclear. Needs to show more confidence. Doesn't answer many questions.



Keywords:
  • non-fiction, research, genocide, Anne Frank

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16