Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: “There and Back Again” Critical Auto-ethnography RUBRIC
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
“There and Back Again” Critical Auto-ethnography RUBRIC
“Tell me about yourself” Critical Auto-ethnography RUBRIC
Research the approved topic. Submit an autoethnography in one of several modalities . Include a bibliography citing at least 3 resources used researching the topic. Project will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research in addition to students personal narration , credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code:
Y23A8CC
By
rlotz56
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Autoethnography
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Unsatisfactory
1 pts
Content
Excellent
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--All researched information is analyzed thoughtfully, not just summarized.
--Narratives are written with effective technique, well-chosen details, and subtle organization.
--Vignettes are shared with descriptive elements, well-chosen details, and subtle organization.
Good
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Most researched information is analyzed, some just summarized.
--Narratives are written with acceptable technique, good details, and effective organization.
--Vignettes are shared with acceptable elements, some details, and effective organization.
Fair
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Some information is analyzed, much is just summarized.
--Narratives are written with fair technique, good details, and fair organization
--Vignettes are shared with fair elements, good details, and fair organization.
Poor
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Information is merely stated or summarized.
---Narratives are written with poor technique, minimal details, and poor organization.
--Vignettes are shared with inconsistent elements, minimal details, and poor organization.
Unsatisfactory
--Unclear and inappropriate organization, lacking transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--All researched information is merely summarized.
--Narratives are written with ineffective technique, ill-chosen details, and little or no organization.
--Vignettes are shared with missing elements, minimal details, and no organization.
Formatting
Excellent
--Paper/project is at least 5 full typed pages.
--Title page is properly formatted.
--double spaced.
--12 pt., Times New Roman.
--1" margins.
--Visually exceptional
Good
--Paper is at least 4 typed pages in length/8 digital slides/pages.
--Title page is properly formatted.
--double spaced.
--12 pt., Times New Roman.
--1" margins
--Visually pleasing
Fair
--Paper is at least 3 typed pages in length.
--Title page is close to the proper format.
-- font and margins partially correct.
--Visually fair
Poor
--Paper/project is less than 2 typed pages in length.
--Title page is missing.
--font and margins not correct.
--Not visually pleasing
Unsatisfactory
--Project is not in final-draft form
--does not meet assignment criteria
Grammar and Mechanics
Excellent
--No run-on sentences
--No fragments
--No spelling errors
--No errors in subject/verb agreement, pronouns or tense
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors
Good
--Only one run-on sentence OR only one fragment
--4 or less spelling errors
--4 or less errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
-- 4 or less punctuation or capitalization errors
Fair
--2 run-on sentences OR fragments
--5 or more spelling errors
--5 or more errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
--5 or more punctuation or capitalization errors
Poor
--8 or more run-on sentences OR fragments
--More than 8 spelling errors
--More than 8 errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
-- More than 8 punctuation or capitalization errors
Unsatisfactory
--Grammar and mechanical errors interfere with conveyance of message
Quality of Self-Reflection
Excellent
--Creative representation of data (incl. creative writing, images, collage, etc.)
--Multiple representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows thorough, thoughtful representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
Good
--Moderate representation of data (incl. creative writing, images, collage, etc.)
--Some representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows thoughtful representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
Fair
--Basic representation of data (incl. creative writing, images, collage, etc.)
--Minimal representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows incomplete representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
Poor
--Basic representation of data.
--No representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows no representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
-
Unsatisfactory
--No evidence of self-reflection, synthesis, or critique.
Works Cited/Citations
Excellent
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Good
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor
--No sources properly cited in paper and/or bibliography.
Unsatisfactory
--No source citations
Presentation
Excellent
-Presentation meets time criteria 8-10 minutes
-Appearance neat and professional.
- At least three Multimedia tools used
Good
-Presentation too long for Time Criteria 12-15 minutes
-Appearance acceptable for Presentation
At least two Multimedia tools used
Fair
-Presentation too short for time criteria 8-9 minutes
-Attire Distracting
-At least one multimedia tool used
Poor
-presentation to short for time criteria 7-8 minutes
-Attire Inappropriate for Presentation
-No Multimedia tool used
Unsatisfactory
- presentation under 5 minutes
- no attention to appearance
- no multimedia in presentation
- no audience engagement
Keywords:
Research, autoethnography, language, literacy, education
Subjects:
English
Social Sciences
Education
Types:
Project
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.