Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Lab Report Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Lab Report Rubric
Rubric for Lab Report
At the school's Baazar, Tihirah noticed the burger vendor, Mr. Charles adding pineapple slices to the meat burger he served her. Mr. Charles explained that pineapples had a natural chemical in it which aids digestion of the meat making it softer. Tihirah wondered if this was true and wanted to do an experiment to test the information. Plan and Design an experiment to assist Tihirah to test this information.
Rubric Code:
Y235BCA
By
Aabidah
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Hypothesis
4 pts
Excellent
Hypothesis is complete and accurate using complex construction method.
Related to the Observation,
Can be experimented on in the lab, Only one condition or variable is changed or manipulated.
Good
Hypothesis is almost complete and accurate and is aligned to two of three criteria and uses complex construction.
Fair
Hypothesis section is stated and aligned to one of three criteria and uses "IF THEN" method of construction
Poor
Hypothesis section is stated but is not aligned to observation, experimental procedure or changes more than one variable or condition.
Very Poor
Hypothesis is omitted.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Aim
4 pts
Excellent
Related to the Hypothesis and stated as an aim with correct use of an action verb, linking a dependent and independent variable and related to the method.
Good
Related to Hypothesis and is almost accurately stated.
Fair
Related to Hypothesis and is partially accurately stated.
Poor
Related to Hypothesis but not method and is not accurately stated as an aim with inaccurate use of verb, dependent or independent variable.
Very Poor
Aim is omitted.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Apparatus and Materials
4 pts
(3 points)
Excellent
All apparatus and materials listed with quantities and sub-divided to show distinction between apparatus and materials.
Good
Most apparatus and materials listed with most quantities
Fair
Some apparatus and materials listed with some quantities given
Poor
Few apparatus and materials listed with some quantities given
Very Poor
Apparatus and Materials section is omitted.
Feature / Points
Excellent
20 pts
Good
15 pts
Fair
10 pts
Poor
5 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Procedure
20 pts
Excellent
Complete, logically written sequence listed in numbered chronological steps using instructional or command voice format and can easily be duplicated.
Procedure states details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, clearly states how to ensure one manipulated variable, how to measure the responding variable, formats to record data and to present results.
Good
Mostly complete, logically written sequence listed in numbered chronological steps using instructional or command voice format and can easily be duplicated.
Procedure mostly state details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, clearly states either how to ensure one manipulated variable or how to measure the e responding variable.
Fair
Somewhat complete, illogically written sequence listed in numbered steps using instructional or command voice format and is not easily duplicated.
Procedure sometimes give details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, but does not state either how to ensure one manipulated variable or how to measure the e responding variable.
Poor
Incomplete, illogically written sequence, difficult to follow listed in numbered steps using voice format other than instructional or command and is not easily duplicated.
Procedure does not state details of time, quantities, duration, repetition of samples or procedure, clearly how to ensure one manipulated variable, how to measure the e responding variable.
Very Poor
No procedure is stated.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Experimental Set Up
4 pts
Excellent
All Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.
Good
Most Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.
Fair
Some Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.
Poor
No Scientific Drawing Rules adhered to make a drawing of the experimental set up.
Very Poor
section is omitted.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Results
4 pts
Excellent
All expected trends are stated, including accurately stating the trend related to the Aim and Procedure
Draft table for recording data is drawn.
Good
Trend related to the Aim and Procedure is accurately stated along with at least two other trends.
Fair
Trend related to the Aim and Procedure is accurately stated alone
Poor
Trend stated is inaccurate.
Very Poor
No trend is stated.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Limitations, Precautions Possible Sources of Error
4 pts
(4 points)
Excellent
More than two Limitation, Precaution and Sources of Error is accurately stated in listed numbered format.
Good
Two Limitation, Precaution and Sources of Error is accurately stated in listed numbered format.
Fair
One Limitation, Precaution and Sources of Error is accurately stated in listed numbered format.
Poor
Either Limitation, Precaution or Sources of Error section is omitted and what is stated is not in numbered, listed format.
Very Poor
All three sections are omitted.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Creativity, Presentation Visual Impact
4 pts
Excellent
Creative and well organised, neatly presented and clearly marked subsections, very effective use of visuals and technology tools to present work
Good
Well organised and neat using technology tools to present work
Fair
Well organised but not neat
Poor
Fairly presented, showing scant regard for the importance of layout or layout is unappealing with untidy work
Very Poor
Carelessly presented, showing scant regard for the importance of layout or layout is unappealing
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Technical Requirements
4 pts
Excellent
All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings rarely violated.
Conventions for headings, subheadings rarely violated.
Use 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri. Never use stylized fonts.
Always use normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around).
Always use double spacing.
All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent.
Good
All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings violated few occasions.
Conventions for headings, subheadings violated few occasions.
few instances of 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri not being used. Never use stylized fonts.
Always use normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around).
Double spacing rarely violated.
All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent.
Fair
All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings violated sometimes.
Conventions for headings, subheadings violated sometimes.
Some instances of 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri not being used. Never use stylized fonts.
some instances normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around) not being used.
Double spacing violated at times.
All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent.
Poor
All Convention for Tables, Graphs, Figures, Drawings violated regularly.
Conventions for headings, subheadings violated regularly.
instances of 12-point very legible font such as Times New Roman or Calibri not being used. Never use stylized fonts.
regular instances normal margin setting (2.54 cm all around) not being used.
Double spacing violated regularly.
All work created using MS Office programmes or equivalent is not adhered to.
Very Poor
All rules violated throughout on numerous occasions.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Cover Page
4 pts
(10 points)
Excellent
All information is provided: Name of Student
Class
Subject
Unit Topic
Lab Number
Page Number
Date
Good
Almost all information is provided.
Includes 5-6 pieces of information
Fair
Some information is provided.
3-4 pieces of information is included.
Poor
Little information submitted.
1-2 pieces of information stated.
Very Poor
No cover page is submitted.
Feature / Points
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Very Poor
0 pts
Use of Academic English
4 pts
Excellent
Strict adherence to conventions of academic English:
-correct grammar
-correct use of punctuation
-Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.
Good
Mostly adhered to conventions of academic English:
-correct grammar
-correct use of punctuation
-Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.
Fair
Some adherence to conventions of academic English:
-correct grammar
-correct use of punctuation
-Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.
Poor
Little adherence to conventions of academic English:
-correct grammar
-correct use of punctuation
-Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.
Very Poor
No adherence to conventions of academic English:
-correct grammar
-correct use of punctuation
-Sentences that are well structured and communicate the writer's ideas as intended.
Keywords:
science lab
Subjects:
Chemistry
Science
(General)
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Chemistry rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.