Skip to main content
iRubric: MYP Personal Project - Max Arthay rubric

iRubric: MYP Personal Project - Max Arthay rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
MYP Personal Project - Max Arthay 
Remote-Controlled Car
Rubric Code: Y234A48
By MaxArthay
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Category
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Construction Quality

Poor

The remote-controlled car was built with an abundance of major errors and flaws that cause inefficiencies and issues with the overall functionality of the vehicle. The appearance of the vehicle is horrible and it is evident that the bare minimum amount of time and effort was put into the creation of the frame and exterior. Absolutely no attempt was made to hide wires or other technical components.
Fair

The remote-controlled car was built with several major errors or flaws that affect the functionality of the vehicle. The appearance of the vehicle is not particularly pleasing and it is evident that little time and effort was put into the creation of the frame and exterior.
Good

The remote-controlled car was built with few major errors or flaws. The appearance of the vehicle is somewhat pleasing and it is evident that some time and effort was put into the creation of the frame and exterior.
Excellent

The remote-controlled car was built with absolutely no major errors or flaws. The appearance of the vehicle is visually pleasing and it is evident that time and effort were put into the creation of the frame and exterior.
Functionality

Poor

The vehicle is not able to exceed a speed of 10 miles per hour and is not able to fare in at least 2 of the 4 different types of specified terrain (gravel, grass, dirt, and sand).
Fair

The vehicle is able to exceed a speed of 10 miles per hour and is able to somewhat fare in at least 2 of the 4 different types of specified terrain (gravel, grass, dirt, and sand).
Good

The vehicle is able to exceed a speed of 15 miles per hour and is able to fare decently in 3 of the 4 different types of specified terrain (gravel, grass, dirt, and sand).
Excellent

The vehicle is able to exceed a speed of 20 miles per hour and is able to efficiently fare in all of the 4 different types of specified terrain (gravel, grass, dirt, and sand). The vehicle contains an additional apparatus that allows it to store and fire projectiles in response to remote feedback.
Programming Quality

Poor

The programming aspect of the vehicle has an abundance of flaws and does not or barely works. The vehicle is not able to be operated remotely and requires the use of cables or wires to transmit information between the remote and the vehicle. Python was not used in the slightest to program the vehicle.
Fair

The programming aspect of the vehicle has several flaws and is somewhat clunky and inefficient. The vehicle is able to be operated completely remotely and from a reasonable distance of greater than 10 feet. An outdated version of Python was the language used for programming.
Good

The programming aspect of the vehicle has few flaws and runs smoothly and efficiently. The vehicle is able to be operated completely remotely and from a reasonable distance of greater than 15 feet. A version of Python was the language used for programming.
Excellent

The programming aspect of the vehicle is flawless and consistently runs smoothly and efficiently. The vehicle is able to be operated completely remotely and from a decent distance of greater than 20 feet. The latest version of Python was the language used for programming.
Documentation

Poor

Few to none of the steps of the project were documented and the steps could not be used as a guide for others to follow to create a similar project. Neither pictures nor videos were taken to show the progression of the project and the steps required to complete it. Methods of documentation were essentially not used throughout the entirety of the project.
Fair

Some of the steps of the project were documented in detail, while others were not documented at all, and the steps might be able to be used as a scattered and unorganized guide for others to follow to create a similar project. Either pictures or videos were taken to show the progression of the project and the steps required to complete it.
Good

The majority of the steps of the project were documented in detail and could be used as a guide for others to follow to create a similar project. Both pictures or videos were taken to show the progression of the project and the steps required to complete it.
Excellent

All steps of the project were documented in complete detail and could be used as a definitive guide for others to follow to create a similar project. Both pictures and videos were taken to show the progression of the project and the steps required to complete it.
Knowledge Gained

Poor

The student gained little to no information regarding engineering and programming and definitely could not use the skills to complete projects of equal magnitude. If the project had actually been completed properly, knowledge could have been gained by the student.
Fair

The student gained some information regarding engineering and programming and could use the skills in the future to complete similar projects. Much more knowledge could have been gained throughout the project given that more complex strategies were used and that the project were completed more thoroughly.
Good

The student gained a large amount of information regarding engineering and programming and could use the skills in the future to complete similar projects. More knowledge could have been gained throughout the project given that more complex strategies were used.
Excellent

The student gained an immense amount of information regarding engineering and programming and could use the skills in unison in the future to complete similar or potentially more complex projects.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16