Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Program Format Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Program Format Project
Video Project 2022
A 3-5 minute video; students may work in a group of up to 4, (ok to work w student from different period of the day.) Preproduction, production and post production are all parts of the assignment. Concept & outline must be submitted in google classroom. Each student receiving a grade for the project must take part in each part of production. No remakes unless preapproved.
Rubric Code:
X23AA92
By
AshleyWoodson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Video Project
POOR
10 pts
AVERAGE
20 pts
WELL DONE
30 pts
EXCELLENT
50 pts
Production
POOR
The video shows no forethought of the assignment, production is unorganized and careless.
AVERAGE
The video only slightly resembles the script & storyboard.
WELL DONE
The video is reasonably close to the script & storyboard with only minor discrepancies.
EXCELLENT
The video is an accurate product of the assignment with no missing elements.
Camera & Audio
POOR
Both camera work and audio took away from the film and made it hard to watch.
AVERAGE
Camera work or audio work took away from the film, and made it hard to watch.
WELL DONE
Slight problems with making out certain scenes, or hearing certain lines of dialog.
EXCELLENT
Camera shots are clear, and the audio is understandable.
Appropriateness
POOR
Clear foul language or obviously offensive material in the film.
AVERAGE
Two or more questionable moments that could have been handled better.
WELL DONE
One questionable moment that probably could have been handled better.
EXCELLENT
Students had fun, but were appropriate.
Time Limit
POOR
Film was under 1 minute (not counting bloopers and/or credits).
AVERAGE
Film was between 1-2 minutes (not counting bloopers and/or credits).
WELL DONE
Film was between 2-3 minutes (not counting bloopers and/or credits).
EXCELLENT
Film was 3-5 minutes (not counting bloopers and/or credits). (Can be longer if prior permission given.)
Students & PreproductionPaper
POOR
More than four students, and no papers (script, storyboard, outline and production notes) handed in on time.
AVERAGE
No more than four students, but no paper handed in on time. (script, storyboard, outline and production notes)
WELL DONE
More than four students in a group, but students used google docs for the outline; turned in document with their names, title of the video, and summary (if needed).
EXCELLENT
No more than four students, and students handed in a paper with their names, title of the video, and summary.
Post Production
POOR
No editing was done to the project.
AVERAGE
Editing done primarily without any real hiccups, although no real transitions used.
WELL DONE
Editing done with transitional zooms and fades as appropriate.
EXCELLENT
Editing smooth, audience could follow and didn't feel as if they 'missed' something.
Keywords:
video, outline, script
Subjects:
Humanities
Journalism
(General)
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.