Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Education Website Evaluation Rubric

iRubric: Education Website Evaluation Rubric

preview rubric

 
  view all assessments  

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

Education Website Evaluation Rubric

  Derived from rubric: Education Website Evaluation Rubric
built by FMELLWILLIAMS

Rubric Code: WXCBX75
Evaluation of Education Websites
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: Interactive Learning Educational Website
Categories: Subjects: Education   (General)  
Types: (Other)  
Grade Levels:


Powered by iRubric Website Evaluation
Criteria
  Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Comments
(N/A)
Curriculum Content
Poor

No relationship with curriculum content exists.
Fair

Limited relationship with curriculum content.
Good

Good relationship with curriculum content.
Excellent

Direct relationship with curriculum content.
Comments


Interactivity
Poor

Lacks enhancements to actively involve the learner.
Fair

Minimal enhancements to actively involve the learner.
Good

Contains some enhancements to actively involve the learner.
Excellent

Possess many enhancements that require learner to remain actively involved.
Comments


Critical Thinking
Poor

Student not given opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.
Fair

Student given limited opportunities to engage in higher level thinking.
Good

Student given some opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.
Excellent

Student given extensive opportunities to engage in higher level thinking activities.
Comments


Support Materials
Poor

Support materials do not exist. Technical support is inadequate. Unable to track student progress.
Fair

Limited options for assistance are given. Tracking student progress is available occasionally.
Good

Assistance is available but not quickly accessible. Additional resources are available and student progress can be frequently checked.
Excellent

Assistance is readily available at any point in the website and many additional sources are available with ease of keeping track of student progress.
Comments


Classroom Environment
Poor

No clear use of the website in regular classroom activities.
Fair

Few lessons can be used in the classroom setting and there are few suggestions for use of the website for whole class, individual or group lessons.
Good

Website can be integrated in classroom activities and there are suggested uses for whole class, individual and group lessons.
Excellent

All features can be used in classroom activities and the website includes activities for whole class, individual and group lessons.
Comments


Accessibility
Poor

Graphics/links are not labelled or don't offer rollover labelling, fonts are difficult to read and content does not lend itself to varied learning styles and ability levels.
Fair

Graphics/links are seldom labelled or seldom offer rollover labelling, fonts are sometimes used for ease of student reading and some content is accommodating to varied learning styles and ability levels.
Good

Graphics/links are mostly labelled or have rollover labelling, fonts are mostly easy to read and most content supports varied learning styles and ability levels.
Excellent

Graphics/links are labelled or have rollover labelling, fonts are consistently easy to read and varied learning styles and ability levels are accommodated.
Comments


Age/Grade Level
Poor

Directions, reading level, and product are inappropriate for targeted audience.
Fair

Directions, reading level, and product are sometimes inappropriate for targeted audience.
Good

Directions, reading level, and product are mostly appropriate for targeted audience.
Excellent

Directions, reading level and product are appropriate for targeted audience.
Comments


Assessment
Poor

Assessment is unrelated or not available.
Fair

Assessment does not engage learner and additional assessment is required.
Good

Assessment is usually appropriate and can provide some measure of what has been learned.
Excellent

Assessment is suited to goals and student ability and easily assesses what has been learned.
Comments


Effectiveness in teaching
Poor

Website is ineffective in teaching desired content. Interactivity is unrelated to learning, not directed at student enjoyment.
Fair

Website is partially effective in teaching desired content, with limited interactivity and appeal to students.
Good

Website is mostly effective in teaching desired content, with some interactivity that appeal to students.
Excellent

Website is effective in teaching the desired content in an interactive way that students will enjoy while learning.
Comments


Web Site Evaluation
Efficiency of web site
  Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Comments
(N/A)
Authority
Credibility <BR>
Accuracy<BR>
Affiliation
Poor

No contact details or credentials of the author appeared on the website, nor any detail of the web master. <BR>
<BR>
The web site lacks accurate information.<BR>
<BR>
No affiliations to educational organizations.
Fair

There is insuficient detail on the website with regard to the author and web master. <BR>
<BR>
The site contains partially accurate information.
Good

The website contains a fair amount of detail with regard to credentials of author and his contact details and those of the web master. <BR>
<BR>
It contains mostly accurate information.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Contains affiliations with educational organizations.
Excellent

The author/organisation is clearly identified.<BR>
Appropriate credentials and contact detail are provided. <BR>
<BR>
Contains accurate information.<BR>
<BR>
Affiliations with educational organizations are stated.
Comments


Objectivity
Poor

The web site does not state curricular goals and are bias with .
Fair

The website lacks curricular goals and objectives and are nor completely neutal .
Good

Websites states some curricular goals and objectives, is mostly neutral.
Excellent

Website states curricular goals and objectives. The content is neutral and free from bias.
Comments


Audience
Poor

Website does not state academic levels and contains activities that are not suitable for target audience. Student diversity is not recognised.
Fair

Website has limited activities suitable for target audience and partially recognizes that students learn in different ways.
Good

The website is randomly states the academic level of target audience and activities are mostly suited for the ability level of target audience. It gives recognition to different ways of learning.
Excellent

Clearly states the academic level of target audience and contains content and activities relevant to the audience. It recognizes that students learn in different ways.
Comments


Currency
Poor

The website do not indicate publishing date and date when last updated.
Fair

The site contains either the publishing date or date when last updated but not both.
Good

Site contains the dates published and updated but it is not clearly visible or easily found.
Excellent

The web site clearly indicates the publishing date and the date when content was last updated.
Comments


Design
Aesthetic appeal<BR>
Navigation<BR>
Accessibility
Poor

The site is not visually appealing to target audience. <BR>
<BR>
No balance between graphics and text. <BR>
<BR>
Home page does not contain links to other parts of the website.<BR>
<BR>
Difficult to access the web site and additional software is needed.
Fair

The site is mildly appealing.<BR>
<BR>
There is a slight balance between text and graphics.<BR>
<BR>
The home page contains some links to other parts of the website and only a few are active and current.<BR>
<BR>
The web site can be accessed with effort, (time consuming) and some additional software might be needed.
Good

The site is appealing to audience but lack a balance between graphics and text.<BR>
<BR>
Home page contains direct links to other parts of the web site but links are not all current or active.<BR>
<BR>
The web site can be accessed with some effort and some additional software is required.
Excellent

The site is visually appealing to target audience and contains a good balance between graphics and text. <BR>
<BR>
Home page contains direct links to other parts of the web site, links are current and active.<BR>
<BR>
The web site is easily accessible and no additional software is required.
Comments





Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
Copyright © 2019 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n148