Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: 2023 Science Fair Exploratorium STEM Challenge Judges Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
2023 Science Fair Exploratorium STEM Challenge Judges Rubric
2022 Science Fair Exploratorium STEM Challenge Judges Rubric
St. Mary School Science Fair Exploratorium STEM Challenge Judges Rubric, Grades 6 - 8
Rubric Code:
W23BWX8
By
NDSTEMFELLOW
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Science Fair Judges Rubric
Excellent
10 pts
Good
6 pts
Needs Improvement
3 pts
Incomplete
0 pts
Introduction
Excellent
Student clearly identifies his/herself to judges and introduces their STEM Challenge Project. Student is well groomed and appropriately dressed.
10-9-8-7
Good
Student missed one of the following: Student clearly identifies his/herself to judges and introduces their STEM Challenge Project. Student is well groomed and appropriately dressed.
6-5-4
Needs Improvement
Student missed two of the following: Student clearly identifies his/herself to judges and introduces their STEM Challenge Project. Student is well groomed and appropriately dressed.
3-2-1
Incomplete
Student missed three or more of the following: Student clearly identifies his/herself to judges and introduces their STEM Challenge Project. Student is well groomed and appropriately dressed.
0
Exploratorium Design & Methodology
Excellent
Model is 3D, used in the exploratorium, & is useful in understanding the exploratorium. Well designed plan and 2 activities selected that support the Earth Science Exploratorium Concept.
10-9-8-7
Good
Design is missing one of the following: Model is 3D, used in the exploratorium, & is useful in understanding the exploratorium. Well designed plan and 2 activities selected that support the Earth Science Exploratorium Concept.
6-5-4
Needs Improvement
Design is missing two of the following: Model is 3D, used in the exploratorium, & is useful in understanding the exploratorium. Well designed plan and 2 activities selected that support the Earth Science Exploratorium Concept.
3-2-1
Incomplete
Design is missing three or more of the following: Model is 3D, used in the exploratorium, & is useful in understanding the exploratorium. Well designed plan and 2 activities selected that support the Earth Science Exploratorium Concept.
0
Tri Fold Poster
Excellent
Title is present, is neat, easy to read, free of errors and appealing. Engineering design process is in the correct order: identify, investigate, imagine, plan, create, test, improve, communicate. Photos & blueprints and descriptions of 3D Model, Activity 1 & Activity 2, & STEM Career are present.
10-9-8-7
Good
Tri Fold Poster is missing one of the following: Title is present, is neat, easy to read, free of errors and appealing. Engineering design process is in the correct order: identify, investigate, imagine, plan, create, test, improve, communicate. Photos & blueprints and descriptions of 3D Model, Activity 1 & Activity 2, & STEM Career are present.
6-5-4
Needs Improvement
Tri Fold Poster is missing two of the following: Title is present, is neat, easy to read, free of errors and appealing. Engineering design process is in the correct order: identify, investigate, imagine, plan, create, test, improve, communicate. Photos & blueprints and descriptions of 3D Model, Activity 1 & Activity 2, & STEM Career are present.
3-2-1
Incomplete
Tri Fold Poster is missing in three or more of the following: Title is present, is neat, easy to read, free of errors and appealing. Engineering design process is in the correct order: identify, investigate, imagine, plan, create, test, improve, communicate. Photos & blueprints and descriptions of 3D Model, Activity 1 & Activity 2, & STEM Career are present.
0
Web Design
Excellent
Web design shows evidence of understanding the Engineering Design Process and all of the components of the STEM Challenge. Topic is clearly identified on the Home Page. Content is neat, free of grammar and spelling errors and well organized with photos and text present.
10-9-8-7
Good
Web design is missing one of the following: Evidence of understanding the Engineering Design Process and all of the components of the STEM Challenge. Topic is clearly identified on the Home Page. Content is neat, free of grammar and spelling errors and well organized with photos and text present.
6-5-4
Needs Improvement
Web design is missing two of the following: Evidence of understanding the Engineering Design Process and all of the components of the STEM Challenge. Topic is clearly identified on the Home Page. Content is neat, free of grammar and spelling errors and well organized with photos and text present.
3-2-1
Incomplete
Web design is missing three or more of the following: Evidence of understanding the Engineering Design Process and all of the components of the STEM Challenge. Topic is clearly identified on the Home Page. Content is neat, free of grammar and spelling errors and well organized with photos and text present.
0
Verbal Presentation & Content
Excellent
Presentation is between 3 to 5 minutes, thoroughly explains STEM Challenge, is able to answer judges questions, is knowledgeable in the subject, and appears practiced in presentation content.
10-9-8-7
Good
Presentation is missing one of the following: Presentation is between 3 to 5 minutes, thoroughly explains STEM Challenge, is able to answer judges questions, is knowledgeable in the subject, and appears practiced in presentation content.
6-5-4
Needs Improvement
Presentation is missing two of the following: Presentation is between 3 to 5 minutes, thoroughly explains STEM Challenge, is able to answer judges questions, is knowledgeable in the subject, and appears practiced in presentation content.
3-2-1
Incomplete
Presentation is missing in three or more of the following: Presentation is between 3 to 5 minutes, thoroughly explains STEM Challenge, is able to answer judges questions, is knowledgeable in the subject, and appears practiced in presentation content0
Keywords:
science fair
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.