Skip to main content
iRubric: Oral Presentation rubric

iRubric: Oral Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Oral Presentation 
Persuasive Speech with Support
Using Monroe's Motivated Sequence, students will deliver a 5-7 minute speech with a min. of 5 oral citations and a min. of 2 visual aids.
Rubric Code: W23BW72
By JasonPittelli
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Communication  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Content
  Poor

25 pts

Sufficient

50 pts

Good

75 pts

Very Good

100 pts

Introduction/Attention Step

Poor

Attention gathered is minimal or does not grab audience. Issue is not clearly defined, nor is its importance established.
Sufficient

Attention-getter is present but limited. The audience may be somewhat confused as to what the issue is and why it relates to them. The importance of the issue is not clearly indicated or brought across.
Good

Attention-getter is effective. The audience is introduced to the issue, but may be unclear with respect to how issue relates to them or why it is important.
Very Good

Attention-getter is highly effective and creates a hunger for future information. The audience is appropriately introduced to the issue and is lead to understand its importance.
Thesis

Poor

No Thesis
Sufficient

Thesis and claims are not connected to proposition
Good

Thesis depends on a series of claims but these may stray from proposition. Line of reasoning is difficult.
Very Good

Thesis depends on a series of claims which are logically linked with proposition. Clear line of reasoning.
3 Claims/Statements

Poor

Unable to identify 3 claims
Sufficient

Claims do not sufficently summarize the evidence presented. 1 or more claims hard to understand.
Good

Claims sufficiently summarize evidence but may be either too broad or too general.
Very Good

Claims are clear and effective. They are neither too broad or too general. They clearly and effectively summarize stated evidence.
Evidence

Poor

Uses questionable sources; uses sources which don’t support the thesis. Less than 2 or no sources cited or clearly mentioned.
Sufficient

Uses weak sources or only one type of source. Some sources (at least 2-3) are cited during the speech.
Good

Uses a mix of highly credible sources and some weaker ones. Limited variety of sources. At least 4 sources are cited during the speech and appear to be credible; dates and/or other impt. info. included
Very Good

Uses highly credible supporting material from a variety of sources (e.g. books, newspapers, magazines, data bases; interviews) Sources strengthen the argument; credibility of speaker. All necessary sources are cited during the speech (min. of 5); proper credit given to authors; dates and/or other impt. info. included.
Persuasive Appeals

Poor

no appeals were used
Sufficient

Appeals were not used appropriately and the audience was not connected
Good

Appeals were used appropriately, but minimal adaptation to the target audience. More appeals could be used to increase the interest and motivate the audience.
Very Good

A variety of appeals were used ethos, pathos, logos), maintains interest and increase audience commitment
Transitions

Poor

Transitions are not used
Sufficient

Transitions are not used effectively .
Good

Transitions aid movement throughout the speech, but are not artfully used.
Very Good

Transitions are artfully used between each section serving to seamlessly bridge ideas.
Visual Aids

Poor

Use of or lack of visual aid detracted from speech.
Sufficient

visual aid adds nothing of significance
Good

Min. of one visual aids/audio adds some interest and clarity.
Very Good

Min. of one Visual/audio aids greatly enhances interest and clarity in the content.
Conclusion/Visualization Step

Poor

There wasn’t a noticeable visualization step. Minimal impact conclusion.
Sufficient

The visualization was minimal, or had inappropriate material. Final appeal was adequate and somewhat memorable.
Good

The visualization step gave the audience an image of the future that they can work towards. Effective final appeal.
Very Good

The visualization step was well adapted to the audience and gave them a clear and vivid image of the future; The conclusion has an effective final appeal and is very memorable.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98