Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Group Project: Exemplarily Leaders rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Group Project: Exemplarily Leaders
Group Project: Exemplarily Leaders
As a group think about exceptional leaders you have had. What made these leaders great? Provide specific examples. Did you come up with any additional characteristics or practices that these leaders modeled? Chose one team member to write down your ideas and one member to present your ideas.
Rubric Code:
VX9935B
By
matt1404
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Group Work
Needs Improvement
0 pts
Fair
0.5 pts
Distinctive
1.04 pts
Total
(N/A)
Group Dynamics
Needs Improvement
The group did not work well due to insufficient communication outside of class, frequent absences, or members did not provide research elements on time.
Fair
The group worked well together in class, but very little out-of-class work was completed to a high standard, did not communicate well to each other or to me, most work was completed on time
Distinctive
The group worked well together as a group, each person contributed and had a part in each stage of the project, handed in all group assignments on time, took time to prepare together for teaching demonstration.
Total
Individual Fulfilment of Role
Needs Improvement
Very little, if any, contributions to group discussions, did not fill one of the given roles, did not have individual work completed on time.
Fair
General contribution to group information gathering and discussions; some help in preparation for teaching demonstration; little participation in Blackboard activities; did not complete all tasks on time.
Distinctive
Actively and positively participated in group discussions and completed work on time, completed all individual assignments.
Total
Presentation Format
Needs Improvement
No creativity in presentation: no clear objectives in lesson, not all group members have a role, no evidence of planning or preparation for an integrated presentation, group members simply present their papers one at a time. Delivery is inaudible or distracting.
Fair
Shows evidence of some creative preparation: Some evidence of lesson objectives, group members have a role in the demonstration, but presentation is only somehwhat integrated, interaction with the class is limited. Delivery imay not be completely clear.
Distinctive
Creative integrated presentation format with obvious prior preparation and clear objectives for lesson plan: Clear role for all members of the group; obvious interaction with class. delivery is clear. .
Total
Content
Needs Improvement
There is a lack of understanding of terminology and/or concepts; therefore, the language in question is not analyzed correctly.
Fair
There is basic understanding of terminology and concepts, but the language in question is not completely analyzed correctly because of misapplication of those concepts or terms.
Distinctive
There is clear application of terminology and concepts, and the language in question is analyzed accurately.
Total
Organization
Needs Improvement
There is a lack of a clear introduction with a clear thesis statement which causes the body of the paper to be incoherent and/or lack unity. The conclusion is repetitive or lacking.
Fair
The introduction is somewhat clear, and there is a thesis statement; however, there may be a lack of specificity which causes the body of the paper to lack coherence and/or unity. There is a weak conclusion.
Distinctive
There is a clear introduction with a clear thesis statement. The body of the paper clearly explains the elements of the thesis. A conclusion which does not simply repeat the introduction is presented.
Total
Grammar and Mechanics
Needs Improvement
Sentence-level grammatical and mechanical errors intrude upon the reader's ability to comprehend the paper. Documentation style is incorrect.
Fair
Grammatical and mechanical errors do not intrude upon the reader's ability to comprehend the essay; however, sentence-level errors are numerous. Documentation style may not be correct.
Distinctive
There is grammatical control, and mechanical errors are few. Documentation style is correct.
Total
Subjects:
English
(General)
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.