Skip to main content
iRubric: Writing a Sonnet rubric

iRubric: Writing a Sonnet rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Writing a Sonnet 
Elements of Shakespearean or Petrarchan Style Sonnets in a series of poems
Rubric Code: V2XA3W2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Sonnet
  Poor

1 pts

Minimal

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Appropriate Format

Shakespearean (lines: 1-12 problem, 13-14--resolution); Petrarchan (lines: 1-8--problem, 9-14--resolution)

Poor

Poetry does not sound like either sonnets. Does not have 14 lines, problem/solution inappropriately divided, does not follow iambic pentameter, follows no rhyme scheme.
Minimal

Poetry strays somewhat from proper sonnet format, has elements of one or more other poetry forms, has less or more than 14 lines, 5+lines have more or less than 10 syllables in each line, and usually contains at least one of the following: problem/solution appropriately divided, iambic pentameter, and proper rhyme scheme for selected style.
Good

Poetry mostly follows proper sonnet format but has elements of one or more other poetry forms. 2-4 lines contain less than or more than 10 syllables. Frequently some of the following apply: 14 lines, problem/solution appropriately divided, iambic pentameter, proper rhyme scheme for selected style.
Excellent

Poetry follows proper sonnet format. Virtually all of the following applies: 14 lines, problem/solution appropriately divided, iambic pentameter, proper rhyme scheme for selected style.
Creativity

Poor

Poetry generally exhibits no creativity at all which does not distinguish it from other poetry, in 1 or no lines.
Minimal

Poetry shows minimal creativity that distinguishes it from other poetry, yet it relies on other poems for their ideas, in 2 lines
Good

Although occasional phrases or ideas are borrowed/revisited, poetry has shows creativitiy, in 3 lines
Excellent

It is evident that the poet was innovative, taking great care to be creative. Expresses creativity with great thought,in 4 or more lines.
Central Idea or Image

Specificity and Intensity of Subject Matter

Poor

Untitled poetry random rather than cohesive. Reader is unable to perceive theme and is unaffected emotionally, sensibly, and/or intellectually.
Minimal

Poetry exhibits minimal cohesiveness; reader struggles to follow theme. Titles show little connection to poetry. There is little sustained effect on reader's emotions, senses, and/or intellect.
Good

Poetry is generally thoughtful and cohesive; theme is easy to follow. Title, though appropriate, lacks creativity. Reader's emotions, senses, and/or intellect are stirred in a somewhat sustained manner.
Excellent

Poetry is well-crafted. Attention-getting title and creatively-constructed, cohesive theme leave no doubt as to the focus. Grabs/transports reader's emotions, stirs reader's senses, and/or appeals to reader's intellect in a sustained manner. Encourages reader to make poetry his own.
Figurative Language

Examples: imagery, similes, metaphors, parallelism, alliteration

Poor

Little or no usage of literary devices. Musicality nonexistent; poetry is wordy and/or blands, in 1 or none lines.
Minimal

Minimal or unbalanced usage of figurative language tends toward wordiness. Although expressing some creativity, little is memorable. Slight musicality, in 2 lines.
Good

Usage of the language, shows some creative thought and balance; occasionally, devices are memorable. Poetry is sufficiently concise and cohesive so as to exhibit a general musical tone, in 3 lines.
Excellent

Rich with a variety of fresh, memorable, mood-setting language which actively engage the reader. No wasted verbiage. Poetry is flowing, musical, vivid, intentional. In 4 or more lines.
Mechanics

Spelling, Punctuation, Grammar

Poor

Poor mechanics make it diffucult for the people to read it, in 1 or none lines.
Minimal

Although poem is readable, frequent errors in mechanics distract the reader, in 2 lines
Good

Few errors in mechanics; thus, reader is seldom distracted. Punctuation/capitalization generally help reader determine poetry's rhythm, in 3 lines.
Excellent

With little exception, mechanical errors are absent. Punctuation/capitalization are highly effective in helping reader determine poetry's rhythm, in 4 or more lines.



Keywords:
  • Poetry, Sonnet, Shakespeare, Shakespearean, Petrarch, Petrarchan

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98