Skip to main content
iRubric: Renewable and Non Renewable Resources Debate rubric

iRubric: Renewable and Non Renewable Resources Debate rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Renewable and Non Renewable Resources Debate 
Debate
Rubric Code: V226628
By agarsee
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Debate
  Level 4

10 pts

Level 3

8 pts

Level 2

6 pts

Level 1

5 pts

Understanding of Topic

Level 4

The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information convincingly.
Level 3

The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.
Level 2

The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.
Level 1

The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Opening Statement

Level 4

Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and gives information to build their argument
Level 3

Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly gives information to build their argument.
Level 2

Opening statement attempts to clearly define the viewpoint of the team and does not give any additional information
Level 1

Opening statement doesn't define the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Argument

Level 4

3 main points. Clearly expresses their viewpoint, includes details and examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Level 3

3 main points. Points clearly expresses their viewpoint, includes details and examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Level 2

2 main points. Attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, includes details and examples to support their answer.
Level 1

1 main point. Attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, includes details and examples to support their answer.
Rebuttal

Level 4

All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to accurately defend position.
Level 3

Majority of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to defend position.
Level 2

Some of counter arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was somewhat able to defend position.
Level 1

Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Was unable to defend position.
Concluding Statement

Level 4

Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Level 3

Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way.
Level 2

Concluding statement attempts to clearly sum up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points.
Level 1

Concluding statement doesn't sum up the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Respect for Other Team

Level 4

All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Level 3

Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Level 2

Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.
Level 1

Statements and responses were consistently not respectful. Consistently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Participation

Level 4

Team member actively participated in the presentation of the debate
Level 3

Team member participated in the debate, but was not engaged.
Level 2

Team member participated in the debate minimally.
Level 1

Team member did not participate in the debate.
Prep Participation

Level 4

Team member actively participated in the in class debate prep
Level 3

Team member participated in the in class debate prep briefly.
Level 2

Team member was often off task during the in class debate prep.
Level 1

Team member did not participate in the in class debate prep.
audience behavior

Level 4

Actively listening while in the audience.
Did not talk during other debates.
Only supportive comments or feedback given
Level 3

Listening during the debate
Not talking during other debates
Only supportive comments or feedback given.
Level 2

Listening during debate
talking during other debates
supportive comments or feedback given.
Level 1

Not listening
talking during other debates
negative comments or feedback given to other teams
sportsmanship

Level 4

Teammate showed good sportsman ship toward their team, the opposition and the audience
Level 3

Teammate showed good sportsman ship toward their team and either the opposition or the audience
Level 2

Teammate showed good sportsmanship to either their team, the opposition or the audience
Level 1

Teammate did not show good sportsmanship.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98