Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Comparative Analysis rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Comparative Analysis
Comparative Analysis
Students respond analytically to literary text.
Rubric Code:
V223W4B
By
leaawilson
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Reading
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Responding Analytically
Surpassing Standards
20 pts
Meeting Standards
17 pts
Approaching Standards
15 pts
Emerging
12 pts
Not Meeting Standards
10 pts
Establishing Claim/ Assertion
Surpassing Standards
Develops thoughtful, accurate and coherent interpretations with a comprehensive grasp of the text.
Meeting Standards
Develops adequately accurate and reasonably coherent interpretations of the text.
Approaching Standards
Develops limited interpretations that lack accuracy or coherence as related to ideas, premises or images from the text.
Emerging
Develops erratic interpretations that lack accuracy and coherence as related to ideas, premises or images from the text.
Not Meeting Standards
Does not relate to task. Lacks an interpretation or may be a simple retelling of the text. Lacks textual examples.
Use of Evidence
Surpassing Standards
Provides clear and thorough textual examples and details to support interpretations. Uses appropriate MLA citation.
Meeting Standards
Provides textual examples and details to support interpretations. Uses appropriate MLA citation.
Approaching Standards
Provides few, if any, textual examples and details to support the interpretations. Does not use appropriate MLA citation.
Emerging
Provides few, if any, textual examples and details. The examples and details do not clearly support the interpretations. Does not use appropriate MLA citation.
Not Meeting Standards
Lacks textual examples. Does not use appropriate MLA citation.
Demonstrates Critical Thinking
Surpassing Standards
Effectively and insightfully connects the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas in order to advance relevant themes of perspective.
Meeting Standards
Connects the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas in order to advance relevant themes of perspective.
Approaching Standards
Connects the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas in order to advance relevant themes of perspective, but analysis may be inaccurate or incomplete.
Emerging
Superficial connections of the text to prior knowledge, other texts or broader world of ideas. Ineffectively advances or fails to identify relevant themes of perspective.
Not Meeting Standards
No attempt to connect the text to prior knowledge, other texts, or broader world of ideas. Fails to identify and advance relevant themes of perspective.
Format
Surpassing Standards
Length is appropriate for chosen format. Project follows proper formatting including clear introduction to the topic, analysis of all 3 resources and a clear conclusion.
Meeting Standards
Length is somewhat appropriate for chosen format. Project follows proper formatting including clear introduction to the topic; analysis of at least 2 of the resources; clear conclusion.
Approaching Standards
Length is slightly appropriate for chosen format. Project follows proper formatting; limited analysis of all 3 resources.
Emerging
Length is not appropriate and the format is not as instructed.
Not Meeting Standards
Length is not appropriate and the format is not as instructed.
Grammar/Spelling
Surpassing Standards
Clean and free of spelling and grammatical errors and presents complex use of grammar and vocabulary.
Meeting Standards
Minor spelling or grammatical errors.
Approaching Standards
Noticeable spelling and/or grammatical errors.
Emerging
Spelling and grammatical errors distract reader.
Not Meeting Standards
Most sentences need revision; errors interfere with comprehension.
Keywords:
Literature, analysis, reading
Subjects:
English
Foreign Languages
Geology
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Presentation
Reading
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.