Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Student Participation in Flipgrid Discussions rubric

iRubric: Student Participation in Flipgrid Discussions rubric

preview rubric

 
  view all assessments  

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

Student Participation in Flipgrid Discussions built by pdelmas

Rubric Code: UXCBX77
adapted from Herman, J.H. & Nilson, L.B. (2018) Gauging the effectiveness of a discussion. In S.D. Brookfield, Creating Engaging Discussions. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: (None)
Categories: Subjects: Education  
Types: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate


Powered by iRubric Criterion Level
  Exemplary
3 pts
Satisfactory
2 pts
Developing
1 pts
Unacceptable
0 pts
Preparation for Discussion
Preparation for discussion.
Exemplary

Shows deep understanding of the readings/viewings and frequently refers to them for ideas/evidence and perspectives.
Satisfactory

Shows satisfactory understanding of the readings/viewings and refers to them for ideas/evidence and perspectives.
Developing

Shows superficial understanding of the readings/viewings OR infrequently refers to them.
Unacceptable

Shows little to no evidence of having done the readings/viewings.
Quality of Thought Demonstrated
Quality of thought demonstrated in discussion.
Exemplary

Analyzes, synthesizes or evaluates course material and advances the discussion in a new direction.
Satisfactory

Analyzes, synthesizes or evaluates course material deeply enough to advance the discussion.
Developing

Repeats information from the course material, showing little thought about the ideas or perspectives.
Unacceptable

Makes irrelevant, superficial, or disruptive comments OR none at all.
Quality of Feedback
Quality of feedback to other students.
Exemplary

Makes multiple (2 or more) high-quality comments on the contributions of other students; builds on contributions, asks questions about them, or tactfully critiques them.
Satisfactory

Makes quality comments on the contributions of one other student; builds on contributions, asks questions about them, or tactfully critiques them.
Developing

Makes superficial comments on the contributions of one other student.
Unacceptable

Does not comment, at least not constructively, on the contributions of other students.
Quality of Video
Quality of audio, video, and clarity of communication.
Exemplary

Video is clear, audio is distinct, and communication is effective with correct grammar and enunciation.
Satisfactory

Video and audio quality are acceptable, communication is understandable, though errors are present in grammar or enunciation could be clearer.
Developing

One element (audio, video, or communication) is of poor quality, overshadowing the content of the video.
Unacceptable

Content is unintelligible due to poor quality of two or more elements (audio, video, and communication).
Timeliness of Participation
Timeliness of participation in discussion.
Exemplary

All deadlines for the discussion are met.
Satisfactory

Initial deadline for contribution is not met (but student still contributes initial post within the forum's 7-day period [lesson]).
Developing

Initial deadline for contribution is not met (but student still contributes initial post during the following lesson).
Unacceptable

Did not participate in discussion.



Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
Copyright © 2019 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n172