Skip to main content
iRubric: Final Video Game Design Project rubric

iRubric: Final Video Game Design Project rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Video Game Design Project 
Final Video Game Design Project
A rubric of several different characteristics about videogames
Rubric Code: UXBBB5W
By lshifflett
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Category
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

7 pts

Fair

5 pts

Poor

0 pts

First gameplay

Excellent

First gameplay attracts the gamers attention, also easy sticks out in memory
Good

First gameplay is somewhat attractive.
Fair

First gameplay is okay
Poor

No effort on testing on gameplay
Title

Excellent

Accurate picture of the game, easy to remember, highly attractive
Good

Accurate picture of the game, pretty good picture, somewhat easy to remember
Fair

An obscure picure seen only once in the game, not very good picture
Poor

A picture that has absolutely nothing to do with the game, and incredibly bad one at that
Technical Proficiency

Excellent

There are no glitches, no unexpected movement, no pauses in gameplay and no inneffective camera movements
Good

There are barely noticable glitches, unexpected movements, pauses or ineffective camera movements, but not enough to diminish gameplay
Fair

Glitches, unexpected movements, pauses and ineffective camera movements are apparrent and effect gameplay, but not enough to stop you from playing the game
Poor

Glitches,unexpectedmovements, pauses and inneffective camera movements are apparent and effect gameplay enough to keep you from wanting to play the game
Level Design

Excellent

Level Design is well done and clean. Fun to be in and add to the atmosphere.
Good

Level Design is pretty good, though there is something missing. They neither add nor detract from the game itself.
Fair

Level Design is okay, but not really that good. Sampled the previous default level design but not exactly the same layout
Poor

Level Design is bad. Can't imagine what the game designer was thinking. Was never present in class or was too much on Youtube
Replay Value

Excellent

This game can be played over and over again and be just as mush fun as it was the first time
Good

This game can be played again, but it will not be the as much fun the second time around as it was the first time it was played through
Fair

While you could play this game again, why would you really want to?
Poor

After playing it through the first time, you might as well use the disk as a coaster
Fun Factor

Excellent

This game is great fun! You can see yourself rushing home and staying up late into the night to play it
Good

This game is fun! Although you woudn't create time to play it, when you do have free time, it would be a welcome diversion
Fair

This game is alright. When you get tiredd or frustrated with your other games, this would be one of the alternates you would consider playing instead
Poor

This game is awful. You would rather read a book than play this game
Overall Effectiveness

Excellent

If you had a game console and could own only ten games, this would be one of them
Good

It would hurt you to have to part with this game, but you could if you had to do so
Fair

Although it was fun to play, it would not be difficult to get rid of this game to pick up some extra cash
Poor

You would be angry at having spent your hard-earned cash on this game
Creativity

Excellent

Most of the graphics or objects used reflect the designer's exceptional degree of creativity and skill
Good

Several of the designers graphics reflect skill
Fair

Only one or two graphics showed and skill or creativity at all
Poor

Terrible, this game is a complete copycat of other games, and a bad one at that
Originality

Excellent

Product shows a large amount of originality and thought, ideas are creative and inventive, this is the type of game where others copy off.
Good

Product shows some original thought. work shows new ideas and insights
Fair

Product uses several other people's ideas (but gives them credit) shows little creative thinking
Poor

Uses other people's ideas without giving them credit
Scenario/Applied Script to the game

Excellent

Contains a clear detailed description on how the game is played and the rules are clearly explained. The scoring is fair and there are some strategies offered
Good

Contains a clear description on how to play, somewhat good guides, the scoring isn't quite fair but it's close.
Fair

Contains an understandable description on how to play the game but there may be an area of confusion. The strategy tips may be absent
Poor

Contains a description of how to play the game, but lacks the full detail needed to understand the directions
Script/Plot

Excellent

Script is present in the game, descriptive,and perfectly understandable
Good

Script is present and in the right place
Fair

Script/plot is present but doesn't tie into the game
Poor

No correlation between Script/Plot and the game.



Keywords:
  • Videogames



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16