- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Ancient Rome Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Ancient Rome Project Ancient Rome Project Create a model or diorama depicting a famous building or structure of Ancient Rome Rubric Code: U23X4B6 By makhtar2 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Project Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Ancient Rome Project
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Good 20 pts	Great 25 pts
Creativity	Poor Project had no original thought.	Fair Project showed little creativity.	Good Project was fairly creative. Used color and more than 2 types of materials to create model/diorama	Great Project was extremely creative and it was clear that student put a large amount of thought into it.A variety of materials were used to create a detailed diorama/model.
Visuals	Poor Lack of effort is evident, not visually appealing. Product is not relevant to project.	Fair Student put some effort visuals, they are slightly appealing. The product is slightly relevant to the project.	Good Effort is evident in a visually appealing product that does not detract from the project.	Great The student went above and beyond to create a very visually appealing product that enhances the project.
Knowlege of Subject	Poor Student did not include a written piece to their model/diorama,	Fair Student knew a little about their subject but did not write purpose of structure/building	Good Student had good knowledge about their subject and wrote some key facts about it.	Great Student had excellent knowledge about their subject and wrote a clear description detailing the importance of this structure/building.
Overall effort	Poor Very little effort and time was evident	Fair Some effort and time was put into the project.	Good Much effort and time was put into the project	Great Obvious effort and much time was put into the project.
Spelling, Grammar and Punctuation	Poor More than 10 mistakes	Fair 6-10 mistakes	Good 1-5 mistakes	Great No mistakes
works cited	Poor no works cited	Fair work cited but only used 1 source	Good work cited but not in proper format as shown on description page	Great all works cited following proper format