Skip to main content
iRubric: Educational Leadership Philosophy Paper rubric

iRubric: Educational Leadership Philosophy Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Educational Leadership Philosophy Paper 
Leadership Profile Paper
Write a personal philosophy based on educational leadership. Connect personal beliefs with language and content learned in this course.
Rubric Code: U23X36W
By abnettj
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

Exceeds assignment objectives

5 pts

Good

Meets assignment objectives

4 pts

Fair

Assignment objectives minimally met

2 pts

Poor

Does not meet assignment objectives

1 pts

Content

Content of paper addresses the three criteria: description/role, Context analysis, synthesis
Excellent

Content addresses assignment including course concepts.

Content and purpose of the writing are clear.

Content answers all of the questions
Good

Content is adequate and addresses assignment.
Many of the questions are answered.
Fair

Content addresses assignment, inadequately

Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Poor

Content is incomplete.
Questions were not adequately answered.
Leadership Traits/Characteristics

Excellent

Student expresses many interpretations about the leadership concepts.

Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with a high degree of relevance.
Good

Student expresses considerable interpretations about the leadership concepts.

Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with considerable relevance.
Fair

Student expresses some interpretations about the leadership concepts.

Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with some relevance.
Poor

Student expresses few interpretations about the leadership concepts.

Makes inferences about the leadership concepts with limited relevance.
Leadership Theory/Style

Excellent

Clear and concise presentation of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student.
Good

Some discussion of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student.
Fair

Some discussion of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student. The discussion needs further development, or clarification.
Poor

Little to no discussion of either the common leadership theme(s) or the leadership theme(s) resonating with the student.
Support/Evidence/critical analysis

Excellent

Student supports interpretations about the leadership theme

Inferences show sophisticated thinking about the concepts.

Student applies knowledge about elements of leadership and uses the knowledge to support inferences with a high degree of relevance.
Good

Student supports interpretations about the leadership theme
Inferences show deep thinking about the concepts.

Student applies knowledge about elements of leadership and uses the knowledge to support inferences with considerable relevance.
Fair

Student supports interpretations about the leadership concepts
Inferences show straight-forward understanding about the concepts.

Student applies knowledge about elements of leadership and uses the knowledge to support inferences with some relevance.
Poor

Student does not explain interpretations about the leadership concept.

Inferences show simple understanding about the concepts.

support inferences with limited relevance.
Organization & Structure

Clear Introduction, body & conclusion
Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Fair

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Format

Excellent

Format enhances readability of paper.

Paper is formatted in APA style with few errors
Good

Format is good.

Paper is formatted in APA style with many errors
Fair

Format is difficult to follow

Paper is not formatted in APA style or too many errors
Poor

Paper lacks most elements of correct formatting.

Paper is not formatted in APA style
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Good

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed with minor errors.
Spelling is correct.
Fair

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.



Keywords:
  • Personal Philosophy



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98