Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER
POLICY ANALYSIS PAPER
Rubric Code:
T225XW6
By
kcchowning
Ready to use
Private Rubric
Subject:
Political Science
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Policy Analysis Paper
OUTSTANDING
90 pts
STRONG
80 pts
ADEQUATE
70 pts
Introduction of Problem/Policy
20 %
OUTSTANDING
Problem and/or existing policy is thoroughly described. The history of the problem/policy is included. Key terms, stakeholders and policy areas needing analysis and resolution are defined.
STRONG
Presents a well-considered position on the issue.
ADEQUATE
Presents a clear position on the issue.
Policy Environment
20 %
OUTSTANDING
Evaluative review of the policy is included. All relevant legislative, judicial, and regulatory policy factors affecting the policy are addressed. Ambiguities, conflicts, problems, and contradictions related to the policies are explained.
STRONG
Explains the factors impacting the policy with logically sound reasons and/or well-chosen examples.
ADEQUATE
Explains most of the factors impacting the policy with relevant reasons and/or examples.
Current Policy (or lack thereof)
20 %
OUTSTANDING
Clarifies the underlying assumptions and effectiveness of the current policy, including, effects on and roles of key stakeholders. Assesses the efficiency of the current policy
STRONG
Discussion is focused and generally well-organized, connecting ideas appropriately. The efficiency of the current policy is assessed.
ADEQUATE
Is adequately focused and organized, but does not assess the efficiency of the current policy.
Policy Alternatives
20 %
OUTSTANDING
Two or more alternative to the current policy are presented. A thorough cost-benefit analysis is provided for each policy alternative.
STRONG
At least two alternatives to the current policy are presented. An adequate cost-benefit analysis is included for each policy alternative
ADEQUATE
At least one alternatives to the current policy are presented. A thorough cost-benefit analysis is provided for each policy alternative.
Written Communication
20 %
OUTSTANDING
Excellent mechanics, grammar, word usage. Language is clear and appropriate. Writing style is effective.
STRONG
Expresses ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety. May have errors in mechanics, grammar, or word usage.
ADEQUATE
Expresses ideas with reasonable clarity. Contains signficant errors in mechanics, grammar, or word usage.
Strength of analysis
15 %
OUTSTANDING
Each assertion is supported with researchable and verifiable support from reputable sources. No bias is evident in the analysis.
STRONG
Assertions are generally well-researched and supported by appropriate reference materials. No bias is evident in the analysis.
ADEQUATE
Some evidence is provided to support many of the assertions, but not all. Reference materials may be inappropriate.
Format
15 %
OUTSTANDING
The paper includes all required basic elements: he paper should be 4-5 pages. typed in a double spaced format, and saved as a Microsoft Word File. All work should be cited using APA format. Papers should include a title page and a works cited page which will not count towards the total page count.
STRONG
The paper includes all required six basic elements: The text of the paper is 3 pages in length.
ADEQUATE
The paper includes most of the required elements, but may be disorganized. And/or the text of the paper is approximately 3 pages or less.
Citations
10 %
OUTSTANDING
Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice and are cited properly within the text of the paper.
STRONG
Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice and most are cited properly within the text of the paper.
ADEQUATE
Support and evidence are referenced using paraphrasing in the students own voice - citations are not properly formatted.
Research skills
10 %
OUTSTANDING
Paper uses at least 3-5 scholarly sources. Clear evidence of primary research.
STRONG
Paper uses at least 2 scholarly sources.
ADEQUATE
Paper uses at least 1 scholarly sources.
OR
No evidence of primary research.
Subjects:
English
Political Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Add to Gallery
Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.