Skip to main content
iRubric: Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study rubric

iRubric: Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study 
Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study
To assess an 8 week module and be able to comprehend and revise said material in the module.
Rubric Code: S2WBW8C
By randolba
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Module Evaluation 4
How comprehensive is the module?
  Poor

Did not meet any content goals or confusing

1 pts

Fair

Met some of the content but not advancing in learning

2 pts

Good

Criteria met but does not engage the student in the material enough

3 pts

Excellent

Criteria met and student fully engaged in the module of the week

4 pts

Content

Was fully immersive and introduced a new topic with ease
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

I thought this weeks module was the first one that started to use some of the information that was learned in the first three modules and showing how the information is being used in real life examples.
Learning Progression

Progress of learning is comprehensive and develops
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

The module developed more from the third module and how many samples you need to validate a test and that you need to be a CLIA validated lab.
Engagement

Module gives activities and helps to give the student the ability to advance in learning
Poor
Fair
Good

I enjoyed using the webinar to answer questions for the case study. But the first article I think should have been highlighted for certain parts to read than the whole article because I ended up skimming the article. The video also should say only to watch the first half because the second half is not relevant.
Excellent
Relevancy

Is the material up to date and most relevant to the knowledge already known
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

The articles and videos were all up to date and the guidelines that are used today are still from the 2017 guidelines.
Organization

Is the module organized and follow the learning progression
Poor
Fair
Good

The one thing that I would change is to put the case study above the webinar because the case study uses the webinar and I would say that the bottom article could have been a better use for the case study than the webinar.
Excellent
Scientific Accuracy

Is the data being presented correct/Are there any flaws
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent

There are no flaws in the data and it all has credible sources.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98