Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: ESL Oral Presentation Evaluation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
ESL Oral Presentation Evaluation
ESL Oral Presentation Evaluation
Evaluates the key components of an effective oral presentation for ESL students. This is a holistic assessment.
Rubric Code:
S23X2C5
By
agihofer
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Oral Presentation Evaluation
Poor
1 pts
Good
2 pts
Excellent
3 pts
Teaser/intro/quiz
Poor
Presenter did not choose appropriate questions or images. And/or, the audience was disinterested in, bored by or confused in the topic of the presentation.
Good
Presenter clearly introduced the topic, but failed to build out what would be presented. While the audience understood the purpose, what would be presented remained vague. Supporting images and questions either did not completely relate. While interested, the presenter failed to draw in the audience to follow into the core presentation or subsequently demonstrate engagement with the questions raised.
Excellent
Presenter gave a clear and concise introduction of the topic. The audience could follow and expectations were set as to the presentation's purpose and what was to come. Supporting materials and/or questions related to the topic.
Content
Poor
Presenter failed to give complete facts and/or how facts related to the topic and thesis presented were unclear or incongruent.
Good
Presenter provided facts concisely, however, relevance and/or explanations were at times incomplete.
Excellent
Presenter gave clear and concise facts and demonstrated how such supported the topic presented.
Organization
Poor
Presenter was unorganized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was unclear and confusing to follow.
Good
Presenter was organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was somewhat clear. For the most part it was not confusing to follow.
Excellent
Presenter was extremely organized in the delivery of this presentation. The flow of the presentation was clear and concise and easy to follow.
Language
Poor
Presenter used sentence structures, pronunciation and/or a level of language that detracted from the storyline and did not support the topic.
Good
Presenter used sentence structures, pronunciation and/or language that was mostly appropriate in supporting the storyline and topic.
Excellent
Presenter used sentence structures, pronunciation and/or language that was appropriate in supporting the storyline and topic.
Delivery
Poor
Lack of eye contact, poor voice volume, tone and pacing. Inappropriate gestures and movement, which detracted from the presentation.
Good
Some eye contact and good voice volume, tone and pacing. Some appropriate gestures and movement that supported the presentation.
Excellent
Lots of eye contact. Great voice volume, tone and pacing. Hand gestures and body movement which supported the presentation.
Kahoot/Quiz
Poor
Presenter lacked the minimum (7) number of questions required, supplied too many questions (12). And, most of the questions (and answers) were either too simplistic, easy, inappropriate, or unrelated to the topic of (or technique(s) employed in) the presentation.
Good
Presenter provided a sufficient number of questions (between 7 and 10). All questions were well-formed, appropriate and related to the material presented; however, the questions themselves were bland and failed to fully engage the participants.
Excellent
Presenter provided a reasonable number (between 7 and 12) questions which were well-formed, engaging, and inspired discussion and thought among members of the audience.
Overall Effectiveness
Poor
Presenter was lacklustre, failed to connect with the audience, and the audience responded with disinterest. The purpose of the presentation failed to be achieved. The presenter omitted key elements expected such as an intro, teaser, audience participatory elements (such as a quiz or discussion). And, or, the body of the presentation was irrelevant to the intro and/or conclusion.
Good
Presenter showed some enthusiasm and managed to connect with most of the audience for much of the presentation. Further, the presenter included the key elements expected such as an intro, teaser, participatory elements. The body of the presentation related to the topic given in the introduction.
Excellent
Presenter demonstrated energy and actively engaged the audience throughout.
The audience appeared to absorb the information given and relate to the closing questions posed. Overall, the presentation served the purpose given in the introduction of the topic.
SCORING
21-18 = 5
17-15 = 4
14 - 12 = 3
11- 9 = 2
8 - 0 = 1
Poor
Good
Excellent
Keywords:
Oral presentation evaluation
Subjects:
Communication
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.