Skip to main content
iRubric: Forest Fires rubric

iRubric: Forest Fires rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Forest Fires 
Invasive Species Science writings and presentations
Rubric Code: RXCB82C
By whitesagewoman
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Powered by iRubric forest fires
  No Score

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Logical Approach
pts

#1: Logical Approach
you must show that a thoughtful and sound
process was used to solve the Main Problem.
**in other words: Did you use a reasonable strategy to deal with the Main Problem?
No Score

Your response was
incoherent, off-topic, or
unable to be read.
Poor

You showed barely any
reasonable or consistent
approach to dealing with
the problem
Fair

You showed there was
limited reasoning or
consistency in your
approach to the
problem
Good

You showed that your
approach to the
problem was generally
reasonable, although a
bit inconsistent
Excellent

You proved throughout
your response that your
approach to the problem
was reasonable and
consistent.
Production Distribution of Writing
pts

you must organize
and sustain your writing based on a defined purpose
**in other words: Was it clear what point you were trying to make, and did you focus on that point?
No Score

Your response was
incoherent, off-topic, or
unable to be read.
Poor

There was no defined
purpose or organization
to your response.
Fair

The purpose of your
response was a bit
vague, and there was
limited organization and
focus.
Good

Your response had a
defined purpose,
although it lacked
organization and a clear
focus on that purpose
Excellent

Your response had a
defined purpose, and it
was organized with a
clear focus on that
purpose.
Integration of Knowledge
pts

you must support your arguments and positions with outside information (i.e. “stimulus items”)
**in other words: Did you back up your position with evidence, quotes, statistics, and facts?
No Score

Your response was
incoherent, off-topic, or
unable to be read.
Poor

You provided almost no
support/evidence for
your main idea.
Fair

You provided only
modest support/
evidence for your main
idea and it was not
strengthened by
sources, facts, & details.
Good

You provided adequate
support/evidence for
your main idea and only
limited sources, facts, &
details.
Excellent

You provided convincing
support/evidence for
your main idea and
included appropriate
sources, facts, & details.
Language & Conventions
pts

you must use proper grammar,
spelling, vocabulary, and other conventions of the English language
**in other words: Did you limit mistakes and respond in a thorough and professional manner?
No Score

Your response was
incoherent, off-topic, or
unable to be read.
Poor

Your response was
completely sloppy and
showed no effort to
follow language
conventions.
Fair

Your response was
rather sloppy with
multiple errors related
to language
conventions.
Good

Your response was
mostly professional with
limited errors related to
language conventions
Excellent

Your response was
professional and you
demonstrated a
command of language
conventions




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16