Skip to main content
iRubric: ASL Skills Rubric

iRubric: ASL Skills Rubric

preview rubric

 

edit print email Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run apply to... delete

ASL Skills Rubric

  Derived from rubric: ASL Presenatational Skills Rubric
built by Barde1c

Rubric Code: RX88472
This includes rubric on the 5 parameters in ASL, as well as other areas that are expected when presenting personal narratives. Students will be graded on expressive language skills including non-manual markers, spatial orientation and relationships, facial expressions, and overall fluency. .
ready Ready to use    public Public Rubric

Directly link to this rubric or embed it on your website:
url:
link:
embed:
Keywords: (None)
Categories: Subjects: Communication   Foreign Languages  
Types: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Categories
Total points possible:

____ / 50
  Exceptional
10 pts
Meets Expectations
8 pts
Developing
5 pts
Needs Improvement
2 pts
Comments
(N/A) Any feedback?
Parameters
- Handshapes
- Palm Orientation
- Movement
- Location
Exceptional

Use of all 4 parameters of ASL were clearly defined and well established. Used appropriate form correctly throughout most or the entire presentation.
Meets Expectations

The use of parameters are used accurately 80% of the presentation. The form is somewhat accurate and clear to read, yet produced few errors across parameters.
Developing

Use of inaccurate form of most parameters, or is not produced clearly, but was able to produce some form with 50% accuracy.
Needs Improvement

Student lacks in demonstrating accurate and clear use of parameters during the entire presentation. Produced several errors in form, that makes it hard to recognize.
Comments


Facial Expressions/NMS
- NMS = non-manual signals
- Mouth morphemes
- Eye contact/gaze
- raised/lowered eyebrows
- Role shifting
Exceptional

Facial expressions/NMS were consistent, accurate, and clearly expressed. Student is able to demonstrate multiple expressions and NMS during most or the entire presentation.
Meets Expectations

Student was able to demonstrate 80% accuracy in facial expressions/NMS, but at times expression was neutral. There were few errors that occurred.
Developing

Facial expressions/NMS were mostly neutral, or was not clearly expressed. Or used facial expression/NMS inaccurately throughout the presentation (i.e. eye contact/gaze was used inappropriately). Was able to express with 50% accuracy.
Needs Improvement

Does not demonstrate any use of facial expressions/NMS throughout the presentation, or produces several inappropriate errors.
Comments


Structuring Space
- Index position (i.e. pointing, shifting, placement)
- Spatial relationship
- Spatial agreement
Exceptional

Use of space is consistent, and demonstrates accuracy through index positioning, and spatial relationship/agreement during most or the entire presentation.
Meets Expectations

Use of space is mostly consistent and produces with 80% accuracy. Student was able to self correct their errors for some indexing, and spatial relationship/agreement when recognized.
Developing

Student demonstrated 50% accuracy with some clarity when structuring space. There were still multiple errors in spatial relationship/agreement.
Needs Improvement

Produces several inaccuracies across spatial relationship/agreement. Student is unable to demonstrate the use of space, therefore makes the message unclear during the presentation.
Comments


Sign Accuracy/Production
- Is it conceptually accurate in ASL?
- sign production
- fingerspelling
- numbers
- lexical items
Exceptional

Sign production is conceptually accurate in ASL and are clear and shows no errors during most or the entire presentation.
Meets Expectations

Sign production is clear and accurate about 80% of the time throughout the presentation; produces a few errors that are somewhat mixed with English concepts, but corrects self in ASL.
Developing

Student demonstrated multiple errors in signing, but is able to produce 50% accuracy during the presentation. Some concepts are signed in ASL
Needs Improvement

Sign production is difficult to recognize and are inaccurate. Shows several errors, in which signing becomes full of distractions from the message they are trying to present.
Comments


Tempo/Fluency
-speed
-flow
-texture
Exceptional

Narrative flows smoothly. All pauses are natural and add to the story. The narrative travels at a natural pace without rushing or becoming slow and choppy.
Meets Expectations

Narrative has a good flow. Most pauses are natural but a few may detract from your story. The pace is good but there may be some awkward pauses or rushed areas in the narrative.
Developing

Narrative has a disrupted flow. There are several distracting pauses or rushed potions that make the narrative difficult to comprehend. Pace was either too fast making it difficult to follow or too slow making it hard to comprehend.
Needs Improvement

The presentation was unprepared. Student did not practice flow and the narrative came off chaotic. Story was very difficult to understand .
Comments





Discuss this rubric



Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Bookmark this page:   RCampus RCampus   twit this twitter   delicious del.icio.us   digg Digg   facebook Facebook  
Copyright © 2017 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.