- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Case Brief rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Case Brief Case Brief Assignment is to brief a court case Rubric Code: R23C6B8 By Torocharlie52 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: History Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Written Case Brief
	Exemplary 4 pts	Satisfactory 3 pts	Average 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Issue/Legal Question	Exemplary Issue correctly identified and is stated in the form of a question.	Satisfactory Issue correctly identified, but may contain extraneous information and is not stated in the form of a question.	Average Issue is not completely identified.	Poor Incorrect issue is identified
Facts	Exemplary Includes all relevant facts and the reasoning logically connects the facts to the rule in accord with the opinion.	Satisfactory Includes all key facts and the reasoning may contain weaknesses, but is basically cogent and accords with the opinion.	Average Does not include all key facts and reasoning	Poor Does not include all key facts and reasoning is absent or incoherent or is not in accord with the opinion.
Decision/Action	Exemplary Properly identified action taken by Court and answers the question with a yes or no.	Satisfactory Properly identified action taken by Court, but did not answer the question with a yes or no.	Average Did not properly identify action taken by Court, but did answer the question with a yes or no.	Poor Improperly identified the decision.
Ruling/Summary	Exemplary Summation complete with correct restatement of the issue and rule.	Satisfactory Summation mainly complete and correct.	Average Summation incomplete or incorrect.	Poor Summation lacks clarity and was not consistant with the case.
Dissent	Exemplary Properly identified the justices that wrote dissenting opinions and gave examples of the opinions.	Satisfactory Identified dissent, but gave example of only one opinion.	Average Identified dissent, but gave a portion of one of the opinions.	Poor Failed to properly identify the opinion of the dissenting justices.