Skip to main content
iRubric: Graphing an Amusement Park rubric

iRubric: Graphing an Amusement Park rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Graphing an Amusement Park 
Rubric Code: R23AA5C
By aallenbia
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Poster
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts



Poor

Poster has 2 or less rides and snacks, is messy and unorganized. Not a lot of time was spent on the presentation of the poster.
Fair

Poster has 3-5 rides and snacks, is neat but unorganized. Some time was spent but project could be a lot better.
Good

Poster has 6 rides and snacks. It is very neat, colorful, and organized. Time was well spent on poster and is presentable.
Excellent

Poster has more than 6 rides and snacks. It is neat and organized and very colorful. Time was well spent on poster and is presentable.
Ad
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts



Poor

Amusement Park is nameless, there is no ad for it and no names have been given to the rides/snacks.
Fair

Amusement Park has a name.
There are names for the rides and snacks but no ad has been created.
Good

Amusement Park has been named.
Rides and Snacks are named
Ad has been written about Park
Excellent

Amusement Park has been named.
Rides and Snacks are named fun and amusing names
Ad has been written about Park and it is creative and fun.
Graphs
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts



Poor

No graphs have been created to show data
Fair

Only one graph has been created or there isn't one each of bar/ picture graphs. Graphs are messy and not created properly
Good

One Bar and One Picture Graph have been created
Graphs are made correctly and are neat.
Excellent

One Bar and One Picture Graph have been created
Graphs are made correctly and are neat. Graphs look well made.
Graph Explanation
  Good

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts



Good

No explanation was given for data on graphs
Fair

One explanation is missing or both are not well written.
Good

Both explanations are present and well written. Data is given from packet.
Excellent

Both explanations are present and well written- data is accurate and explanation goes beyond just using the packet.
Group Collaboration
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts



Poor

Group didn't work well together- spent a lot of time arguing or casting blame for things. Did not even try to work cohesively and project did not get completed.
Fair

Group worked together but had to be redirected to stop arguing amongst themselves. Work was shared but not completed well if at all.
Good

Group worked well and there was minimal arguing. Tasks were split evenly and all members participated in making it a good project.
Excellent

Group worked extremely well- there was no arguing and all members completed the tasks. Project is complete with input from all.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98