Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Photography Research Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Photography Research Project
Photography Research Project
Discussions 1.4 Research one artist of your choice and discuss why you feel this work is cohesive. Please post three images from this photographer along a word document with a minimum of 250 words. Respond to a minimum of 4 of your peers.
Rubric Code:
PXA64C3
By
troyshellie
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Reflection
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Writing/Research Assignment
Excellent (A)
10 Points
4 pts
Good (B)
8
3 pts
Average (C)
7
2 pts
Failing (F)
0-6
1 pts
Assignment
Excellent (A)
Student turned in all required materials <BR>
Writing clearly represents assignments focus
Good (B)
Content is comprehensive and accurate.<BR>
<BR>
Interesting image choices. Images support topic. Wide range of images gives indepth look at photographer's work<BR>
<BR>
Research is adequate and timely.<BR>
<BR>
Content and purpose of the writing are clear.<BR>
<BR>
Interesting to read.
Average (C)
Content is not comprehensive. <BR>
Major points are addressed,but not well supported.<BR>
Research is inadequate and does not address required assignment<BR>
Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity<BR>
of thought.
Failing (F)
Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.<BR>
<BR>
Poor image choices. Little thought to sequencing. Images don't give an indepth look at photographer's work.<BR>
<BR>
Some facts inaccurate.
Grammar
Excellent (A)
Consistent and appropriate voice.<BR>
<BR>
Sophisticated and precise word choice.<BR>
<BR>
No spelling errors.<BR>
No errors in agreement or tense. No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Good (B)
Voice is mostly consistent and appropriate.<BR>
<BR>
Correct word choice.<BR>
<BR>
Fewer than 3 spelling errors and/or errors in agreement. No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Average (C)
Voice is somewhat consistent<BR>
and appropriate.<BR>
Correct word choice.<BR>
Fewer than 5 spelling errors<BR>
and/or errors in agreement.<BR>
Fewer than 3 punctuation or<BR>
capitalization errors.
Failing (F)
Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.<BR>
<BR>
Ineffective word choice.<BR>
<BR>
More than 5 spelling errors and/or errors in agreement. More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Quality of Research
Excellent (A)
3 + works cited <BR>
<BR>
Annotated bibliography shows reliability of sources. Exemplary usage of all sources.<BR>
<BR>
Research in-depth and beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Good (B)
3 works cited <BR>
<BR>
Sources mostly reliable. Evidence of sufficient usage of sources.<BR>
<BR>
Research of sufficient depth.
Average (C)
Fails to cite some of 3 sources.<BR>
<BR>
Source reliability is<BR>
questionable. Usage of limited sources evident.<BR>
<BR>
Research of shallow depth.
Failing (F)
Fails to cite 3 sources.<BR>
<BR>
Source reliability is questionable. Usage of limited sources. <BR>
<BR>
Insufficient information provided to support thesis.
Organization & Structure
Excellent (A)
Structure of the written analysis is clear and easy to follow.<BR>
Flow of ideas fluid and logical. Written analysis gives new insights into visual choices. <BR>
Organization transparent, logical, and helpful.
Good (B)
Structure of the written analysis is mostly easy to follow. Written analysis enhances images. <BR>
Organization mostly transparent, logical, and helpful.
Average (C)
Structure of the written analysis is<BR>
not easy to follow.<BR>
Written analysis does not add much to visual choices. Lacks depth.<BR>
Some logical organization<BR>
present.
Failing (F)
Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.<BR>
<BR>
Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.<BR>
<BR>
Written analysis does not develop in a logically consistent manner. Very little depth of analysis of visual images.
Keywords:
Photography Research
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
Education
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
Reflection
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.