Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Technology Project Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Technology Project Rubric
Technology Project Rubric
Students will follow directions, select the appropriate tools and adhere to all safety protocalls in creating a technology project that utilizes critical thinking skills and creativity and innovation.
Rubric Code:
NX77C25
By
PMONTALVAG
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project/Presentation
WOW- exceeds
2 pts
Got it- Good
1.5 pts
met grade level-Fair
1 pts
Not yet-Poor
0.5 pts
Tool Usage
2 pts
WOW- exceeds
WOW- exceeds
Student chose the approptiate tools and used all tools as instructed following all safety guidelines. Tools were cleaned and put away.
Got it- Good
Got it- Good
Student chose some questionable tools, used tools as instructed and followed most saftey guidelines. Tools were cleaned and put away.
met grade level-Fair
Met expectations-Fair
Student made some inappropriate tool choices, did not always follow safety guidelines and may not have cleaned tools or put tools away.
Not yet-Poor
Not yet-Poor
Wrong tool choice for project, safety guidelines were not consistanly followed, tools were left uncleaned and not put away.
Effort/Quality
2 pts
WOW- exceeds
WOW- exceeds
The work done demonstrates full effort that the learner is proud of. The effort that was put into this task is the best it can be by the learner.
Got it- Good
Got it- Good
The work was done with good effort that shows what the learner is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this project.
met grade level-Fair
Met expectations-Fair
Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.
Not yet-Poor
Not yet-Poor
Work is done with little effort, quality is not what the learner is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed and work is incomplete.
Creativity/Innovation
2 pts
WOW- exceeds
WOW- exceeds
The project has an element of creativity and style. Student investigated alternative sources of information, promotes divergent and creative perspectives during discussions, seeks out and uses feedback to revise product to better meet assignment criteria.
Got it- Good
Got it- Good
The project is somewhat creative. Student investigated typical sources of information, some creative perspectives are discussed, uses some feedback to revise product to better meet assignment criteria.
met grade level-Fair
Met expectations-Fair
The project lacks style and creativity. Lacks understanding of the purpose of innovation, few sources were investigated, feedback was not considered much in revisions
Not yet-Poor
Not yet-Poor
The project is not creative. No sources were investigated. Creative perspectives are not discussed and feedback was not used to improve project.
Aesthetics
2 pts
WOW- exceeds
WOW- exceeds
The project is exceptionally attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.
Got it- Good
Got it- Good
The project is attractive in terms of design, layout and neatness.
met grade level-Fair
Met expectations-Fair
The project is acceptably attractive, though it may be a bit messy.
Not yet-Poor
Not yet-Poor
The project is distractingly messy or poorly designed.
Critical Thinking
2 pts
WOW- exceeds
WOW- exceeds
Student can concisely explain why we are doing the project, can formulate questions about the project, obtain and use information from various places, can identify and articulate good ideas, feedback is used to improve work, facts and details can be recalled to explain ideas.
Got it- Good
Got it- Good
Student can adequately explain why we are doing the project, can formulate some questions about the project, obtain and use information from few places, can identify and articulate good ideas, feedback is used to improve work, some facts and details can be recalled to explain ideas.
met grade level-Fair
Met expectations-Fair
Student has difficulty explaining why we are doing the project, can formulate few questions about the project, obtain and use information, can identify but not articulate good ideas, feedback is used somewhat to improve work, facts and details can be recalled to explain ideas.
Not yet-Poor
Not yet-Poor
Student cannot explain why we are doing the project, cannot formulate questions about the project, does not obtain and use information from various places, cannot identify and articulate good ideas, feedback is not used to improve work, facts and details cannot be recalled to explain ideas.
Keywords:
Technology project, tool usage, critical thinkning, creativity and innovation
Subjects:
Engineering
Geology
Science
Social Sciences
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.