Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Small Group Project: Case 9.1 rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Small Group Project: Case 9.1
Case Study
Rubric will be used to guide the implementation of project and to evaluate the outcomes (products, presentation, mock-decision making) of project.
Rubric Code:
N2XA445
By
LMH056
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Case Study 9.1
Poor
0 pts
Fair
1 pts
Good
2 pts
Constructionism v. Constructivism
Poor
Compare and contrast the theories of learning (No examples are presented).
Fair
Compare and contrast the theories of learning (at least ONE example is presented).
Good
Compare and contrast the theories of learning (at least TWO examples are presented).
Identification of Leadership Structure
Poor
Leadership structure is not identified; Group members are not assigned roles; No role structure is presented in the project proposal.
Fair
Leadership structure is identified; Group members are assigned unclear roles; Role structure is vague in the project proposal.
Good
Leadership structure is clearly identified; Group members are assigned specific roles; Role structure is outlined in the project proposal.
Presentation of Case Study Project
Poor
Project goals and objectives are not identified; Project activities do not meet project objectives; documentation of distribution of project responsibilities and tasks is not presented.
Fair
Project goals and objectives are identified; Project activities meet some of the project objectives; Partial documentation of distribution of project responsibilities and tasks is presented.
Good
Project goals and objectives are clearly identified; Project activities meet all of project objectives; Documentation of distribution of project responsibilities and tasks is presented.
Mock-Decision Making
Poor
Mock-decision making models are not used in the project.
Fair
Mock-decision making models are used in the project (at least TWO models are implemented).
Good
Mock-decision making strategies are used in the project (all THREE models are implemented).
Overall Presentation
Poor
Presentation was not specific to decision-making models; Group members did not work together to meet project goals and objectives; Products were not presented to inform or show creativity.
Fair
Presentation was specific to some of the decision-making models; Group members worked together to meet some of the project goals and objectives; Products were presented to inform but did not show creativity.
Good
Presentation was specific to all of the decision-making models; Group members worked together to meet all of the project goals and objectives; Products were presented to inform and were able to show creativity.
Subjects:
Education
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.