Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Argumentative Essay rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Argumentative Essay
Argumentative Essay
Write an argumentative essay using the given prompts. The essay must contain at least 2 fully developed supporting paragraphs, a counterclaim and a refute.
Rubric Code:
M23ACB9
By
mhutton39
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Excellent
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
1 pts
Introduction
Excellent
- "Hook" is successful
- Includes a well-
structured thesis
statement including the claim and 2 Reasons.
- Claims are
mentioned with needed background information.
Good
- "Hook" is attempted
- Includes a thesis
statement.
- Claims are
mentioned with
some background
information.
Fair
- No "Hook"
- Does not include a
thesis statement.
- 1 or 2 claims are mentioned with
minimal
background
information.
Poor
There is no introduction present.
Claim #1
Excellent
Claim is sharp, distinct and maintained throughout.
Persuasive technique is effectively used, implementing facts, quotations, anecdotes and/or evidence.
Good
Claim is apparent and maintained.
Persuasive technique is used, implementing facts, quotations, anecdotes and/or evidence.
Fair
Claim is inconsistent. Techniques are attempted but need more support.
Poor
Statement of position cannot be determined. Paper reads like an informational essay.
Claim #2
Excellent
Claim is sharp, distinct and maintained throughout.
Persuasive technique is effectively used, implementing facts, quotations, anecdotes and/or evidence.
Good
Claim is apparent and maintained.
Persuasive technique is used, implementing facts, quotations, anecdotes and/or evidence.
Fair
Claim is inconsistent. Techniques are attempted but need more support.
Poor
Statement of position cannot be determined. Paper reads like an informational essay.
Counterclaim and Refute
Excellent
Counterclaim is sharp, distinct and maintained throughout.
Refute is well-thought out and convincing.
Good
Counterclaim is clear and maintained throughout.
Refute is presented and convincing.
Fair
Counterclaim is mentioned.
Refute is poorly supported.
Poor
Counterclaim or refute is unclear and not supported.
Organization
Excellent
A variety of thoughtful transition are used. They clearly show how ideas are connected.
Proper paragraph structure is used.
Good
Transition show how ideas are connected, but there is little variety.
Paragraph structure is used.
Fair
Some transition work well, but some connections between ideas are fuzzy.
Paragraph structure is attempted.
Poor
The transitions between ideas are unclear and/or nonexisitent.
Conclusion
Excellent
The conclusion is strong and leaves the reader solidly understanding the author's position.
Good
The conclusion is recognizable. The author's position is restated.
Fair
The paper does not end with author's position; therefore the conclusion does not give a solid ending to the essay.
Poor
There is no conclusion; the paper just ends.
Style
Excellent
Author's word choice includes topic-specific vocabulary and a variety of strong verbs.
Formal style is consistently maintained.
Good
Author attempts to use topic-specific vocabulary and strong verbs.
Formal style is present.
Fair
Word choice and strong verb use is limited.
Formal style is inconsistent.
Poor
No attempt made at word choice or use of strong verbs.
Formal style is absent.
Conventions
Excellent
Author follows rules of grammar, so the essay is exceptionally easy to read.
Good
Author makes 1-2 errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content, but the essay is still easy to read.
Fair
Author makes 3-4 errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content and interrupt the flow of the essay.
Poor
Author makes more than 4 errors in grammar that distract the reader from the content and interrupts the flow of the essay.
Presentation
Excellent
Neatly presented and legible.
Margins used.
Good
Difficult to read and/or no margins.
Fair
Poor
Keywords:
Persuasive Essay
Subjects:
English
Health
Journalism
Science
Types:
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.