Skip to main content
iRubric: Video Documentary rubric

iRubric: Video Documentary rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Video Documentary 
Video Documentary
Rubric Code: L2XC3C6
By Manal_Shehayeb
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Mini Documentary
  Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Mini-documentary - content

Good

Documentary is 5–10 minutes in length and clearly and effectively tells the “real” story on a topic that engages multiple audiences. The documentary topic is clearly and fully researched, tells multiple sides of the story, and the interviews support the content. The documentary is engaging and uses still images.
Fair

Documentary is 5–10 minutes in length and includes still images. The documentary story uses research and interviews to support the content and engages multiple audiences.
Poor

Absent, incomplete, or unfocused.
Research

Good

Project is well researched with sufficient evidence to give a complete account of the event.
Fair

Project contains a few facts but needs more evidence to add to the credibility of the case.
Poor

Project shows little evidence of research. Project does not include facts from the case that support the limitations of human justice.
Information

Good

The team's video documentary is very informative. It covers the required criteria which is the history, features, benefits, and the downfalls of two types of communication; as well as how they affect society. The team's personal viewpoint is also expressed.
Fair

The team does not cover all of the required criteria and is not detailed in presenting their information.
Poor

The team does not cover any of the required material. Their video documentary is not detailed or informative. The information that is presented is irrelevant.
Editorial/Script

Good

The voice over script is well-written and gives a complete account of the events of the case.
Fair

The voice over script is poorly written and leaves the audience confused.
Poor

No voice over is included.
Mini-documentary - technical

Good

The documentary includes one or more each of a motion, color, and picture-in-picture effect and each has a clear impact on the mood of the film. The documentary includes an original musical score and a full menu of credits. It is in DVD format with a template menu.
Fair

The documentary uses at least one each of a motion, color, and picture-in-picture effect. Documentary has an original musical score and a full menu of credits. Documentary is in DVD format.
Poor
Creativity

Good

The team presents their video documentary in an extremely unique, original, and creative way. It catches the viewer's attention and holds their interest.
Fair

The team presents their video documentary in a basic way that tries to capture the viewer's attention.
Poor

The team's video documentary is not presented in an original or creative way. The information is read to the viewers and fails to present the information in an interesting format.
Graphics

Good

Project has appropriate graphics. The graphics enhance the project and are well placed and thought out.
Project shows great effort, and the graphics help tell the story of the case.
Fair

Project has many graphics. Some graphics are not appropriate for the content of the case. Timing of the graphics need work. More graphics would improve the quality of the presentation.
Poor

Project has only a few graphics that help tell the story. Some graphics are inappropriate for the content of the case.
Organization

Good

The team's information in the video documentary is organized and flows. The transitions are smooth and the material is easy to comprehend. The video documentary ranges from 8-10 minutes in length.
Fair

The team's information in the video documentary has a general order and flow. The material is presented in a difficult manner. The video documentary ranges from 5-7 minutes in length.
Poor

The team's information is not organized in any manner and lacks a flow of conversation. The terminology used to present the material is unfamiliar to the viewier. The video documentary is less than 5 minutes in length.
Deadline

Good

Finished project turned in before or on deadline
Fair
Poor

Finished project NOT turned in before or on deadline




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98