Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Student and Peer Digital Project Rubric

iRubric: Student and Peer Digital Project Rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
Student and Peer Digital Project Rubric 
Student's will complete collabrative writing assignments assignments to meet alternate writing standards. They will use peer assistance to research details about their own lives and interests. ST4. Use tech, to produce, publish and update projects and to display info. ST5. Gathering info from muliple source, assess usefulness, intergrate info, to maintain flow. ST6. Conduct short research project, or solve a problem demonstrate understanding of subject.
Rubric Code: L2XAX86
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12


Powered by iRubric Software Evaluation
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Average

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Peer/Teacher Interviews

Poor

Student did not participate in completing interviews that contained information about the subject. None of listed peers tutors and teachers interviewed.
Fair

Student did not participate in completing interviews that contained information about the subject. Less than half of listed peers tutors and teachers interviewed.
Average

Student participated and assisted in completing interviews that contained information about the subject with at least half of listed peers tutors and teachers.
Good

Students successfully participated and assisted in completing interviews that contained information on interactions with subject with all listed peers tutors and teachers.
Excellent

Students successfully participated and assisted in completing interviews that contained information on interactions, personal descriptions with subject with all listed peers tutors and teachers.
Student Time Line/family history

Poor

Student did not display subject history birth to current.
Fair

Student displayed incomplete subject history birth to current family members.
Average

Student displayed subject history birth to current and family members.
Good

Student displayed subject history birth to current including personal milestones, and family members.
Excellent

Student displayed subject history birth to current including personal milestones, significant events, and family members.
Students Daily Activities

Poor

No video clips, no activities listed, no participation from subject.
Fair

Provided 1 video clip of student activities during school and at lest a description of subject's daily home life.
Average

Provided minimal video clips of subject activities during school and at lest a description of subject's daily home life.
Good

Provided video clips of all subject activities during school and at least a description of subject's daily home life.
Excellent

Provided video clips of all subject activities during school and video of homelife activities.
Technology Variation

Poor

No integration of technology soft ware used. No pictures scanned, no music.
Fair

Used 1 form of technology to attempt to intergrate information during presentation. Pictures added music used.
Average

Used at least 2 forms of technology to intergrate information to maintain a flow of information during presentation. Pictures added music used.
Good

Used a variety of technology to intergrate information to maintain effective flow of information through out the presentation. Pictures were scanned, and music selections added to quality of the presentation.
Excellent

Used a wide variety of technology to intergrate information to maintain effective flow of information through out the presentation. Pictures were scanned, and music selections added to quality of the presentation.
Subject Participation

Poor

No subject particpation. No collabrative effort with peers.
Fair

Subject participation was minimal. No documentation provided in journal entries.
Average

Subject participation in half of the project. Documentation provided in journal entries for activities subject participated.
Good

Subject participation throughout project. Documentation provided in journal entries for most activities subject participated.
Excellent

Subject participation throughout project. Documentation provided in journal entries for all activities subject participated in and collabrative effort is documented.
Editing and Revision

Poor

No documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and reconsiderations.
Fair

No documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and reconsiderations, but some attempts made to correct errors.
Average

Documentation in journals of preparation, and planning few errors made.
Good

Documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and some reconsiderations.
Excellent

Documentation in journals of preparation, planning, and reconsiderations.
Completion of project

Poor

Project not completed, not turned in.
Fair

Project completed with minimal requirements met.
Average

Project completed with adequate requirements met.
Good

Project completed missing 1 requirement but still effective.
Excellent

Project completed with all requirements met.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2020 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n109