Skip to main content
  • help_outline help
iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Index Card Towers rubric

iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Index Card Towers rubric

 
find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   apply to...   delete   Do more...
Engineering Design Process: Index Card Towers 
This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process for designing an Index Card Tower.
Rubric Code: K2XA893
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8


Powered by iRubric Engineering Design Process
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Design

Poor

Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building.
Fair

Some materials were used correctly.
Good

Good use of the materials and plan. The tower was nice and well put together, but there were parts that weren't well made.
Excellent

Great use of materials! You maximized your use of materials and created a great tower.
Collaboration

Poor

You did not collaborate at all with your partner, but worked on your design process by yourself. No feedback was given or received.
Fair

You collabarated very little with your partner in the dssign process and hardly gave/received feedback and suggestions.
Good

You collaborated most of the design process with your partner and gave/received feedback and suggestions.
Excellent

You collaborated throughout the design process with your partner and gave and received feedback and suggestions.
Criteria - height

Poor

Tower was less than 12 inches tall
Fair

Tower was between 12 to 15 inches tall
Good

Tower was between 16-20 inches tall
Excellent

Tower was between 21-24 inches tall
Criteria-stability

Poor

Tower was not stable and fell immediately when the stuffed animal was placed on it.
Fair

Tower was somewhat stable, and held the stuffed animal for less than 20 seconds before it started shifting
Good

Tower was quite stable, and held the stuffed animal for 20-30 seconds before the tower started shifting
Excellent

Tower was extremely stable and held the stuffed animal for over 30 seconds without it shifting.
Time Management

Poor

Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the brainstorming and design phase of engineering.
Fair

Sometimes used time well. There were times when you got off task during brainstorming and design phase.
Good

Good use of time, there were a few times when you got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.
Excellent

Great use of time.You stayed on task during each phase of the process.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2020 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n17