- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: PROFILE ESSAY rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
PROFILE ESSAY PROFILE ESSAY Rubric Code: J2XA65A By jmjosten Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: Undergraduate

PROFILE ESSAY Enter rubric description
	Exemplary (N/A)	Adequate (N/A)	Inadequate (N/A)
FOCUS/PURPOSE 0-10 points	Exemplary Profile focus very clear One dominant impression of the subject Comments:	Adequate Focus implied/discernable Comments:	Inadequate Focus unclear Comments
CONVENTIONS of the PROFILE ESSAY 0-15 points	Exemplary Strong use and careful selection of incorporated quotes Strong attention-getting opening/lead *Strong descriptive details Comments:	Adequate Decent use of quotes Some descriptive detail *Basic opening/lead Comments:	Inadequate Weak use of quotes Weak opening/snoozefest *Little or no descriptive detail Comments:
STYLE AND PERSPECTIVE 0-10 points	Exemplary Writing is smooth and skillful. Strong and expressive sentences. Point of view is consistent (3rd person) and words are well chosen. Comments:	Adequate Writing is mostly clear and easy to understand, but dull in spots. Revision could have improved sentence variety. Inconsistent POV. Comments:	Inadequate Writing is confusing and hard to follow. Sentences are dull and monotonous. Incorrect POV. Comments:
COHERENCE and ORGANIZATION 0-5 points	Exemplary Strong, clearly relevant and coherent development and progression of ideas Writer stays on subject and is organized from start to end. Comments:	Adequate Mostly relevant and mostly logical development of supporting points Comments:	Inadequate Inadequate or irrelevant development and weak coherence Comments:
MUGS (mechanics, usage, grammar, spelling) 0-5 points	Exemplary Minimal grammatical errors and well-developed style Comments:	Adequate Some grammatical errors, meaning clear, simple sentence structure, undeveloped style Comments:	Inadequate Serious grammatical errors, obscuring meaning, weak sentence structure and weak sense of style Comments:
MLA Documentation (secondary source works cited) 0-5 points	Exemplary Minimal errors in MLA formatting, documentation and incorporation of source material Comments:	Adequate Some errors Comments:	Inadequate Serious errors Comments: