Skip to main content
iRubric: Odyssey Characters Media & Summary Project 2022 rubric

iRubric: Odyssey Characters Media & Summary Project 2022 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Odyssey Characters Media & Summary Project 2022 
Media Literacy Unit Project 2018
Presentation focusing on the Odyssey and Media Literacy. Includes: media, research, text summary, visual, and presentation component.
Rubric Code: J236BX3
By LERT123
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Project Points To Cover
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Character Development

Excellent

Student created 5 or more well developed facts explaining their character to the class. The descriptions are informative and provide a thorough coverage of the character.
Good

Student created 4-5 adequately developed facts explaining their topic to the class. The descriptions are informative and provide satisfactory coverage of the character.
Poor

Student created 4 or more useful facts about the topic. Explanation is presented in simplistic language.
Unsatisfactory

Student created less than 3 facts or does not adequately reflect the assignment. Explanation is too broad (not character specific) and uses simplistic language.
Spelling, Punctuation, & Punctuation

Excellent

Student worked carefuly, re-read and edited their work thoroughly to make sure their grammatical work was 99% correct. The writing flows perfectly and there are no punctuation errors.
Good

Student may have re-read their work over once or twice and did not appropriately edit what they had created. There were some grammatical and punctuation errors but the writing was still clear enough to understand.
Poor

Student did not appropriately edit the work they had created. Sentences were unclear, where there were up to 4 spelling and or punctuation, and or capitalization errors. writing was still clear enough to understand
Unsatisfactory

Student did not re-read and edit the work they had created. Sentences were unclear, where there were 5 or more in spelling, punctuation, and capitalization.
Research

*Quality Research does not include any Wiki- sites.
Excellent

Student utilized three (3) or more quality research sources. The research was incorporated in the presentation and summary and was relevant to the character. The research lead to a thorough understanding of the character.
Good

Student utilized two (2) quality research sources. The research was incorporated in the presentation and summary and was mostly relevant to the character. The research lead to a basic understanding of the character.
Poor

Student utilized less than two (2) quality research sources. The research was poorly incorporated in the presentation and summary and was loosely relevant to the character. The research lead to a poor understanding of the character.
Unsatisfactory

Student did not utilize any quality research sources. The research was not incorporated in the presentation and summary. The lack of quality research lead to a poor or no understanding of the character.
Creativity

Excellent

Creativity is excellent! Character in media piece is well defined and context is easy to follow. The student an outstanding job manipulating color, formatting, transitions, sound or video, and/or other creative techniques.
Good

Good creativity. Character in media piece is sufficiently defined and context is able to be follow. The student manipulated color, formatting, transitions, sound or video, and/or other creative techniques to a reasonable extent.
Poor

Character in media piece has some definition and context is not easily followed. The student manipulated only some of the following areas: color, formatting, transitions, sound or video, and/or other creative techniques.
Unsatisfactory

Student employed little or no creative elements in their presentation. There are no elements to intrigue the viewer (e.g. graphics, design, choreography, dialogue, colors, etc.)
Media

Excellent

Media relates well to the topic; is incorporated effectively to demonstrate an area of study; interesting/educational/
relevant/sufficient media to demonstrate topic. Clearly demonstrates media literacy.
Good

Media used relates to the topic; is incorporated into the presentation; attempts to demonstrate an area of media literacy; could use additional examples to convey the topic.
Poor

Media used loosely relates to the topic; is incorporated into the presentation; shows minimal demonstration of media literacy; needs additional examples to effectively convey the topic.
Unsatisfactory

It is unclear how the media relates to the topic of study or there is no media. The presentation did not introduce or did not give context to the topic using media and was not able to hold the interest of the audience.
Presenting

Excellent

Project was on time and of appropriate duration. Presentation was clear and interesting. Student was able to focus on his or her own presentation, and respected all peer presentations.
Good

Project was on time, and attempted to meet time requirements. Student was generally able to focus on his or her own presentation, and mostly respected peer presentations.
Poor

Project was late, not presented, or presentation not taken seriously, inadequate. Student was unable to quietly respect peer presentations.
Unsatisfactory

Project was incomplete, late, or not presented. Student was frequently unable to quietly respect peer presentations.
Audience

Excellent

Student respected all peer presentations by being quiet and attentive during the presentation. Student asked relevant questions at the end of the presentation. Student was able to contribute to the presentation.
Good

Student respected all peer presentations by being quiet and attentive during the presentation. Student asked a question at the end of the presentation or was able to contribute to the presentation.
Poor

Student occasionally interrupted the presentation(s) with questions. Student was able to contribute to the presentation(s).
Unsatisfactory

Student often interrupted the presentation(s) with non-relevant questions or was otherwise disrespectful to the presenter. Student did not positively contribute to the presentation.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98