Skip to main content
iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Design a Hydroponic Stystem rubric

iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Design a Hydroponic Stystem rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Engineering Design Process: Design a Hydroponic Stystem 
Engineering Design Process: Trash to Toys
This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process for designing a Hydroponic System. Limitations: must fit on top of a lab desk, be portable, conserve water.
Rubric Code: GX5AA2X
By maxine907
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Engineering Design Process
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

5 pts

Good

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Problem

Poor

No problem statement, or does not address the 3 essential questions.
Fair
Good
Excellent
Plan

Poor

You did not plan what you were going to build nor plan on what materials to use.
Fair

Some evidence of a plan. There was some thought to materials/building, but not really thought out.
Good

Good evidence of planning done. Materials were listed and thought out, but the plan wasn't quite complete.
Excellent

All materials were listed and well thought out. Details how system will work and possible obstacles are addressed.
Design

Poor

Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building.
Fair

Some materials were used correctly. The system lacked creativity Thee=re were few details leaving the reader unclear about how the invention works.
Good

Good use of the materials and plan. There was adequate explanation of the invention giving the reader a general understanding of how to put together a ski life
Excellent

Creative use of materials! You maximized your use of materials and explaining the invention and giving the reader a clear understanding of how the ski lift works
Time Management

Poor

Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the plan, and design phase of engineering.
Fair

Sometimes used time well. There were times when the group got off task during the plan, and design phase.
Good

Good use of time, there were a few times when the group got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.
Excellent

Great use of time. The group stayed on task during each phase of the process.
Participation

Poor

You had to be reminded several times to stay on task.
Fair

You participated during the building process. The group had to be redirected a few times.
Good

You worked together and didn't have to be redirected that much at all.
Excellent

You worked together flawlessly and got the job done. The group never had to be redirected.
Science

Poor

Demonstrates no understanding of science concepts learned in class
Fair

Group did not use any concepts learned in science, demonstrates an okay understanding
Good

Using only 1 or 2 concepts learned in science, the group demonstrates good understanding
Excellent

Using science concepts learned in class, the group demonstrates an understanding of engineering
Engineering

Poor

ski lift system does not work
Fair

No artistic application of material. Is able to show a system the works, but inconsistently.
Good

Some artistic application of material. ski lift works consistently but does not conform to specifications
Excellent

Exceptional artistic application of material. ski lift works, and conforms to all specifications.
Mathematics

Poor

Group demonstrates no evidence toward careful measurements for cutting material and can explain where kinetic and potential energy changes.
Fair

Group demonstrates little evidence toward careful measurements for cutting material and can explain where kinetic and potential energy changes.
Good

Group demonstrates some evidence toward careful measurements for cutting material and can explain where kinetic and potential energy changes.
Excellent

Group demonstrates careful measurements for cutting material and can explain where kinetic and potential energy changes.



Keywords:
  • engineering, physics

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16