Skip to main content
iRubric: Portfolio rubric

iRubric: Portfolio rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Portfolio 
Portfolio
Rubric for assessing the SST portfolio. This rubric is modeled from http://www.markville.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca/mm/UBC/510/eportfoliorubric.htm
Rubric Code: G2XA7B6
By isaac233
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric History Research Portfolio
  Exemplary/Mastery

100%
Meets the Standard of Excellence

4 pts

Accomplished

75%
Approaches the Standard of Excellence

3 pts

Developing

50%
Clearly Meets the Acceptable Standard

2 pts

Beginning/no project

25%
Does Not Clearly Meet the Acceptable Standard

1 pts

Cover Page and Spine

Name and program(s) on the cover page and spine if applicable.

1. Student name
2. History Portfolio
3. School Name
4. Period
Exemplary/Mastery

___Attractive, and simple with easy to read, consistent font.

___Includes all necessary components w/out mistakes.
Accomplished

___Easy to read font &

___Includes all necessary components.

___May have minor flaw, which could be easily corrected.
Developing

___Legible - may be incomplete.

___Includes all or most necessary components.
Beginning/no project

___Page missing entirely, or is unattractive, illegible, incomplete, messy, fonts/typography shows lack of continuity.
Table of Contents (TOC)

Sections to be noted by colored paper or tab:
A. Letters of Introduction/Cover Letters
B. Artifacts Samples
C. References
D. Research Paper
Exemplary/Mastery

___TOC is exceptional. Visually attractive & has ALL required sections & corresponding content in each section.

___Sections are clearly organized and are noted by colored paper or tab.

___Typography is sensible, consistent and deliberate throughout the portfolio.
Accomplished

___TOC is attractive & has ALL required sections & corresponding content.

___Sections are clearly organized and are noted by colored paper or tab.

___Typography is consistent and deliberate throughout the portfolio.
Developing

___TOC includes all required sections & corresponding content.

___ Organization of content needs refinement.

___Sections are noted by colored paper or tab but are not clearly organized or consistent.

___Typography is inconsistent throughout the portfolio. Fonts/sizes chosen are difficult to read.
Beginning/no project

___TOC is missing entirely or missing some sections of corresponding content.

___Content is disorganized. Needs substantial work to be acceptable.

___Sections are not clearly noted by colored paper or tab.

___Typography is inconsistent and not an appropriate design choice.
Artifact Selections (10-20 samples)

___4(minimum)-20(maximum) artifacts

___ 2 of each Primary and Secondary Sources

___ Sources are valid and of scholarly type
Exemplary/Mastery

___ALL artifacts (work samples) are clearly & directly related to student's progress.

___Artifacts show exceptional or creative choice. A wide variety (10-20) are chosen including one or more progressive artifacts

___Superior presentation of artifacts.
Accomplished

___MOST artifacts are related to student's work.

___Artifacts chosen show variety of learning samples (10-20).

___Segments of a progressive artifact are included.
Developing

___Some artifacts are related to showing student's work.
*Less than 10 artifacts (total).

___Some variety of artifacts are used.
Beginning/no project

___Artifacts are unrelated to the purpose of showing student's.
* 8 or less artifacts.

___Artifacts demonstrate similar skills/competencies and not a variety.

___Presentation is poor and shows no design sense.
Artifact Captions & Pertinence

Caption & rationale.

Artifacts have concise caption & student's rationale for inclusion (6-9 work samples).
Main content, title, date, & description as related to competencies is included.
Exemplary/Mastery

___ALL artifacts have caption & student's rationale for inclusion in portfolio.

___Title, date, & description of work as related to competencies is included.

___ Exceptional display of skill sets.

___ Professional display of artifacts & writing.

____Contents reveal high level understanding of design and/or career concepts.
Accomplished

___MOST artifacts have caption and rationale for inclusion in portfolio.

___Title, date, & description of work as related to curriculum standard is included.

___ May have minor flaw to be easily corrected.

___Contents reveal good level of understanding of design and/or career concepts.
Developing

___SOME artifacts have caption & reason for inclusion in portfolio.

___Title, date, & description of work as it relates to curriculum standard has several minor flaws.

___Needs more detail.

___Contents reveal gaps in knowledge base, limited level of understanding of design and/or career concepts.
Beginning/no project

___Artifacts present but does not have captions and/or rationale for inclusion in portfolio.

___Artifacts present but captions or rationale are confusing, inadequate, or have many mistakes.

___Title, date, &/or description - absence or highly inaccurate.

___Contents reveal very limited OR no base knowledge of design and/or
career concepts.
Research Paper

Critical revealing of student's ability to relate artifacts into a cohesive research report that shows the research goal.
Exemplary/Mastery

___Research Paper clearly describe why artifacts demonstrate achievement of competencies and goals for continued learning.

___All Research Paper illustrates student's ability to effectively critique student's own work & provide constructive suggestions.
Accomplished

___MOST of the Research Paper describe why artifacts demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal & include goals for future learning.

___Most of Research Paper illustrate student's ability to effectively critique own work & provide constructive suggestions.
Developing

___SOME of Research Paper describes why artifacts demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal & include goals for future learning.

___Some of Research Paper illustrates ability to effectively critique own work & provide constructive suggestions.
Beginning/no project

___Research Paper does NOT describe why artifacts demonstrate achievement of each standard or goal & do not include goals for future learning.

___Research Paper does NOT illustrate student's ability to effectively critique own work or provide constructive suggestions.
Layout & Text Elements

Visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, & indentations for headings & sub-headings.

Layout: Use of Horizontal & vertical white space.

Additional influences with readability of text (Background, colors, patterns, etc.)
Exemplary/Mastery

___Very easy to read w/ appropriate visual organization of all items.

___Viewer absorption of content exceptional due to student's ability to use text elements effectively.

___ Layout: ALL parts appropriate.

___Background, colors, and use of white space highly enhance readability of text throughout the portfolio.
Accomplished

___Generally easy to read w/ appropriate visual organization of info.

___ A few minor text element changes or different use of formatting tools would likely increase viewers' absorption of content.

___Layout: Appropriate in MOST parts.

___Background & colors enhance text readability in most places.
Developing

___Often difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization of info.

___Some formatting tools or text elements are under- or over-utilized & decrease viewers' absorption of content.

___Layout uses horizontal & vertical white space inappropriately in SOME parts.

___Background & colors distracting in some places & decrease readability of text.
Beginning/no project

___Difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization.

___ Many formatting tools are under- or over-utilized.

___Layout: Uses horizontal & vertical white space inappropriately; content appears cluttered/sparse.

___Background & colors distracting throughout with text, causing quick loss of interest.
Writing Mechanics

Focused, communicative writing with appropriate language use and mechanics.
Exemplary/Mastery

___Writing demonstrates confident control of language usage & mechanics.

___No errors.
Accomplished

___Writing demonstrates competent control of language usage & mechanics.

___Any minor errors do not reduce clarity or interrupt flow of writing.
Developing

___Writing demonstrates general control of language usage & mechanics.

___Errors may slightly reduce clarity or interrupt flow of writing.
Beginning/no project

___Writing demonstrates faltering control of language usage & mechanics.

___Errors reduce clarity & interrupt flow of writing

___No writing included.



Keywords:
  • ePortfolio



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16